» Articles » PMID: 20682057

Accelerometer Profiles of Physical Activity and Inactivity in Normal Weight, Overweight, and Obese U.S. Men and Women

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2010 Aug 5
PMID 20682057
Citations 145
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is used to describe an accelerometer-derived physical activity/inactivity profile in normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 </= BMI < 30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI >/= 30 kg/m2) U.S. adults.

Methods: We computed physical activity volume indicators (activity counts/day, uncensored and censored steps/day), rate indicators (e.g., steps/minute), time indicators (employing NHANES activity counts/minute cut points to infer time in non-wear, sedentary, low, light, moderate, and vigorous intensities), the number of breaks in sedentary time (occasions when activity counts rose from < 100 activity/counts in one minute to >/= 100 activity counts in the subsequent minute), achievement of public health guidelines, and classification by step-defined physical activity levels. Data were examined for evidence of consistent and significant gradients across BMI-defined categories.

Results: In 2005-2006, U.S adults averaged 6,564 +/- SE 107 censored steps/day, and after considering non-wear time, they spent approximately 56.8% of the rest of the waking day in sedentary time, 23.7% in low intensity, 16.7% in light intensity, 2.6% in moderate intensity, and 0.2% in vigorous intensity. Overall, approximately 3.2% of U.S. adults achieved public health guidelines. The normal weight category took 7,190 +/- SE 157 steps/day, and spent 25.7 +/- 0.9 minutes/day in moderate intensity and 7.3 +/- 0.4 minutes/day in vigorous intensity physical activity. The corresponding numbers for the overweight category were 6,879 +/- 140 steps/day, 25.3 +/- 0.9 minutes/day, and 5.3 +/- 0.5 minutes/day and for the obese category 5,784 +/- 124 steps/day, 17.3 +/- 0.7 minutes/day and 3.2 +/- 0.4 minutes/day. Across BMI categories, increasing gradients and significant trends were apparent in males for sedentary time and decreasing gradients and significant trends were evident in time spent in light intensity, moderate intensity, and vigorous intensity. For females, there were only consistent gradients and significant trends apparent for decreasing amounts of time spent in moderate and vigorous intensity.

Conclusions: Simple indicators of physical activity volume (i.e., steps/day) and time in light, moderate or vigorous intensity physical activity differ across BMI categories for both sexes, suggesting that these should continue to be targets for surveillance.

Citing Articles

Association between physical activity and diabetes mellitus: mediation analysis involving Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index in a cross-sectional NHANES study.

Chen Y, Huang R, Mai Z, Jin Z, Lai F, Chen X BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e082996.

PMID: 39971603 PMC: 11840911. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082996.


Physical activity promotion based on positive psychology: development and piloting of a novel intervention approach.

Bohlen L, Oselinsky K, Vornlocher C, Lee H, Michels E, Dunsiger S Ann Behav Med. 2025; 59(1).

PMID: 39898878 PMC: 11789391. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaaf004.


Temporal trends in aerobic physical activity guideline adherence among nationally representative samples of U.S adults between 2011 and 2019: Cross-sectional findings from a sample of over 2 million adults.

Abernethy D, Bennie J, Pavey T PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316051.

PMID: 39774437 PMC: 11709288. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316051.


Associations of step accelerations and cardiometabolic risk markers in early adulthood.

Stenback V, Lehtonen I, Leppaluoto J, Gagnon D, Jarvelin M, Tulppo M Eur J Public Health. 2024; 35(1):128-133.

PMID: 39656794 PMC: 11832146. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae199.


Association of daily physical activity with pulmonary artery pressure in HFpEF and HFmrEF NYHA class III patients: a pilot trial-feasibility and first results.

Herrmann E, Lange D, Hannig J, Zimmer G, Gruen D, Keller T Clin Res Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39508889 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02564-6.


References
1.
Ekelund U, Brage S, Besson H, Sharp S, Wareham N . Time spent being sedentary and weight gain in healthy adults: reverse or bidirectional causality?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 88(3):612-7. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/88.3.612. View

2.
Bassett Jr D, Wyatt H, Thompson H, Peters J, Hill J . Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in U.S. adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42(10):1819-25. PMC: 2927728. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181dc2e54. View

3.
Healy G, Dunstan D, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw J, Zimmet P . Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(4):661-6. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-2046. View

4.
Wyatt H, Peters J, Reed G, Barry M, Hill J . A Colorado statewide survey of walking and its relation to excessive weight. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(5):724-30. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000161750.84096.d4. View

5.
Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi R, Kang M . Revisiting "how many steps are enough?". Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7 Suppl):S537-43. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c7133. View