» Articles » PMID: 20680499

CT Colonography Before Colonoscopy in Subjects with Positive Faecal Occult Blood Test. Preliminary Experience

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2010 Aug 4
PMID 20680499
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We report a preliminary evaluation of the performance of computed tomography colonography (CTC) systematically obtained before optical colonoscopy (OC) in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT) within a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer (CRC).

Materials And Methods: Seventy-nine subjects with positive FOBT from a regional screening programme were invited to perform same day CTC and OC. CTC was performed with standard bowel preparation. OC with segmental unblinding was the reference standard. A per-patient per-adenoma analysis was performed.

Results: Forty-nine of 79 subjects (62%) with positive FOBT adhered to the study and completed both examinations. Twenty-two (44.9%) of the 49 had a cancer or an adenoma ≥6 mm. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for cancer or adenoma ≥6 mm were 95.5% (95%CI:77.2%-99.9%), 51.9% (95%CI:32.0%-71.3%), 93.3% (95%CI:68.1%-99.8%) and 61.8% (95%CI:43.6%-77.8%).

Conclusions: In the setting of a FOBT-based screening programme for CRC, CTC showed a high sensitivity, but relatively low specificity and positive predictive value, for cancer and adenoma ≥6 mm. Probably performing CTC without faecal tagging as second line test after a positive FOBT is not a cost-effective strategy.

Citing Articles

Radiologic Imaging Modalities for Colorectal Cancer.

Liu W, Zeng A, Tang H, Qiang J Dig Dis Sci. 2021; 67(7):2792-2804.

PMID: 34328590 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07166-0.


Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance and computed tomography colonography for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gao Y, Wang J, Lv H, Xue Y, Jia R, Liu G Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(39):e17187.

PMID: 31574825 PMC: 6775409. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017187.


Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance versus computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sun S, Yang C, Huang Z, Jiang W, Liu Y, Wu H Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(22):e10883.

PMID: 29851808 PMC: 6393025. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010883.


Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process.

Cossu G, Saba L, Minerba L, Mascalchi M Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2018; 14:63-69.

PMID: 29643929 PMC: 5872199. DOI: 10.2174/1745017901814010063.


CT colonography: role in FOBT-based screening programs for colorectal cancer.

Sali L, Grazzini G, Mascalchi M Clin J Gastroenterol. 2017; 10(4):312-319.

PMID: 28447326 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-017-0744-1.


References
1.
Johnson C, Chen M, Toledano A, Heiken J, Dachman A, Kuo M . Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(12):1207-17. PMC: 2654614. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800996. View

2.
Zorzi M, Falcini F, Fedato C, Grazzini G, Sassoli de Bianchi P, Senore C . Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: 2006 survey. Epidemiol Prev. 2008; 32(2 Suppl 1):55-68. View

3.
Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Herman M, Deman R, Rutgeerts L, Ghillebert G . CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(6):1192-202. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2644-x. View

4.
Mulhall B, Veerappan G, Jackson J . Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(8):635-50. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00013. View

5.
Halligan S, Altman D, Taylor S, Mallett S, Deeks J, Bartram C . CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005; 237(3):893-904. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373050176. View