» Articles » PMID: 20621109

Dual-task Conditions Modulate the Efficiency of Selective Attention Mechanisms in Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2010 Jul 13
PMID 20621109
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Given previous demonstrations of both selective and divided attention deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, understanding how declines in the integrity of component processes of selective attention in these patients interact with impairments to executive processes mediating dual-task performance has both theoretical and practical relevance. To address this issue, healthy elderly and AD patients performed computerized tasks of spatial orienting, Simon response interference, and visual search both in isolation and while simultaneously engaged in a visuomotor tracking task (i.e., maintaining car position within a simulated driving environment). Results from the single-task conditions confirmed previous demonstrations of selective attention deficits in AD. Dual-task conditions produced in AD patients (but not healthy elderly) a change in the efficiency of the selective attention mechanisms themselves, as reflected in differential effects on cue or display conditions within each task. Rather than exacerbating the selective attention deficits observed under single-task conditions, however, dual-task conditions produced an apparent diminution of these deficits. We suggest this diminution is due to the combination of deficient top-down inhibitory processes along with a decrease in the attention-capturing properties of cue information under dual-task conditions in AD patients. These findings not only increase our understanding of the nature of the attentional deficits in AD patients, but also have implications for understanding the processes mediating attention in neurologically intact individuals.

Citing Articles

Driving Performance in Older Adults: Current Measures, Findings, and Implications for Roadway Safety.

Toups R, Chirles T, Ehsani J, Michael J, Bernstein J, Calamia M Innov Aging. 2022; 6(1):igab051.

PMID: 35028434 PMC: 8752189. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab051.


Sleep and Attention in Alzheimer's Disease.

Hennawy M, Sabovich S, Liu C, Herrmann N, Lanctot K Yale J Biol Med. 2019; 92(1):53-61.

PMID: 30923473 PMC: 6430169.


Differential Contributions of Selective Attention and Sensory Integration to Driving Performance in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.

Venkatesan U, Festa E, Ott B, Heindel W J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017; 24(5):486-497.

PMID: 29283079 PMC: 5910249. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717001291.


Digital technologies for cognitive assessment to accelerate drug development in Alzheimer's disease.

Leurent C, Ehlers M Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 98(5):475-6.

PMID: 26272508 PMC: 5052022. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.212.


Prototype learning and dissociable categorization systems in Alzheimer's disease.

Heindel W, Festa E, Ott B, Landy K, Salmon D Neuropsychologia. 2013; 51(9):1699-708.

PMID: 23751172 PMC: 4354875. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.001.


References
1.
Lavie N . Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995; 21(3):451-68. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.451. View

2.
Ott B, Heindel W, Papandonatos G, Festa E, Davis J, Daiello L . A longitudinal study of drivers with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008; 70(14):1171-8. PMC: 3664938. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000294469.27156.30. View

3.
Repovs G, Baddeley A . The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience. 2006; 139(1):5-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.061. View

4.
Park S, Kim M, Chun M . Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(5):1062-75. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1062. View

5.
Fernandez-Duque D, Black S . Attentional networks in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology. 2006; 20(2):133-43. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.133. View