» Articles » PMID: 16447379

Attention Capture is Modulated in Dual-task Situations

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2006 Feb 2
PMID 16447379
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because some features affect the efficiency of visual search even when they are irrelevant to the task, they are thought to capture attention in a stimulus-driven manner. If such attention shifts are stimulus driven, they should be unaffected by reduced resources. We added a concurrent auditory task to a traditional attention capture paradigm and found that capture by an irrelevant, abruptly appearing stimulus (i.e., an onset) was eliminated. In contrast, prioritization of an irrelevant color singleton--a stimulus that at most receives only mild prioritization in this paradigm--was increased under dual-task conditions. These results challenge the hypothesis that attention capture by irrelevant features is stimulus driven. Instead, prioritization depends on and is modulated by the availability of resources.

Citing Articles

Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search.

Lawrence R, Cochrane B, Eidels A, Howard Z, Lui L, Pratt J Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8(1):63.

PMID: 37816913 PMC: 10564694. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00516-8.


Difficulty suppressing visual distraction while dual tasking.

McDonald J, Gaspar J, Lagroix H, Jolicoeur P Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(1):224-234.

PMID: 36002716 PMC: 9971087. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02165-2.


Effects of temporal and spatiotemporal cues on detection of dynamic road hazards.

Wolfe B, Kosovicheva A, Stent S, Rosenholtz R Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021; 6(1):80.

PMID: 34928486 PMC: 8688617. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-021-00348-4.


Impact of Spatial and Verbal Short-Term Memory Load on Auditory Spatial Attention Gradients.

Golob E, Winston J, Mock J Front Psychol. 2017; 8:2028.

PMID: 29218024 PMC: 5703860. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02028.


Active Listening Delays Attentional Disengagement and Saccadic Eye Movements.

Lester B, Vecera S Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(3):1021-1027.

PMID: 28537005 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1310-z.


References
1.
Todd S, Kramer A . Attentional misguidance in visual search. Percept Psychophys. 1994; 56(2):198-210. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213898. View

2.
Yantis S . Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(3):676-81. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.3.676. View

3.
Theeuwes J . Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(4):799-806. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.799. View

4.
Tellinghuisen D, Nowak E . The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Percept Psychophys. 2003; 65(5):817-28. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194817. View

5.
GIBSON B, Kelsey E . Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998; 24(3):699-706. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.699. View