» Articles » PMID: 20579641

The Use of Arrays in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2010 Jun 29
PMID 20579641
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), polymerase chain reaction has been used to detect monogenic disorders, and in PGD/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to analyze chromosomes. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using FISH-based PGS on cleavage-stage embryos and one on blastocyst-stage embryos have shown that PGS does not increase delivery rates. Is the failure of PGS due to a fundamental flaw in the idea, or are the techniques that are being used unable to overcome their own, inherent flaws? Array-based technology allows for analysis of all of the chromosomes. Two types of arrays are being developed for use in PGD; array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism-based (SNP) arrays. Each array can determine the number of chromosomes, however, SNP-based arrays can also be used to haplotype the sample.

Objective(s): To describe aCGH and SNP array technology and make suggestions for the future use of arrays in PGD and PGS.

Conclusion(s): If array-based testing is going to prove useful, three steps need to be taken: [1] Validation of the array platform on appropriate cell and tissue samples to allow for reliable testing, even at the single-cell level; [2] deciding which embryo stage is the best for biopsy: polar body, cleavage, or blastocyst stage; [3] performing RCTs to show improvement in delivery rates. If RCTs are able to show that array-based testing at the optimal stage for embryo biopsy increases delivery rates, this will be a major step forward for assisted reproductive technology patients around the world.

Citing Articles

Optimized NGS Approach for Detection of Aneuploidies and Mosaicism in PGT-A and Imbalances in PGT-SR.

Garcia-Pascual C, Navarro-Sanchez L, Navarro R, Martinez L, Jimenez J, Rodrigo L Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(7).

PMID: 32610655 PMC: 7397276. DOI: 10.3390/genes11070724.


Motives and considerations regarding PGT in couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality: a qualitative exploration.

de Krom G, Severijns Y, Vlieg W, Arens Y, van Golde R, de Die-Smulders C J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37(7):1719-1727.

PMID: 32418135 PMC: 7376769. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01810-w.


Preimplantation Genetic Screening and The Success Rate of Fertilization: A Three-Years Study on Iranian Population.

Totonchi M, Babaabasi B, Najafi H, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L Cell J. 2020; 22(4):467-475.

PMID: 32347040 PMC: 7211278. DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2021.6784.


Cumulus-corona gene expression analysis combined with morphological embryo scoring in single embryo transfer cycles increases live birth after fresh transfer and decreases time to pregnancy.

Adriaenssens T, Van Vaerenbergh I, Coucke W, Segers I, Verheyen G, Anckaert E J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(3):433-443.

PMID: 30627993 PMC: 6439096. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-01398-2.


Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Goldman K, Nazem T, Berkeley A, Palter S, Grifo J J Genet Couns. 2016; 25(6):1327-1337.

PMID: 27277129 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9975-4.