» Articles » PMID: 23613950

Identification of Chromosomal Errors in Human Preimplantation Embryos with Oligonucleotide DNA Microarray

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Apr 25
PMID 23613950
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A previous study comparing the performance of different platforms for DNA microarray found that the oligonucleotide (oligo) microarray platform containing 385K isothermal probes had the best performance when evaluating dosage sensitivity, precision, specificity, sensitivity and copy number variations border definition. Although oligo microarray platform has been used in some research fields and clinics, it has not been used for aneuploidy screening in human embryos. The present study was designed to use this new microarray platform for preimplantation genetic screening in the human. A total of 383 blastocysts from 72 infertility patients with either advanced maternal age or with previous miscarriage were analyzed after biopsy and microarray. Euploid blastocysts were transferred to patients and clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were measured. Chromosomes in some aneuploid blastocysts were further analyzed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) to evaluate accuracy of the results. We found that most (58.1%) of the blastocysts had chromosomal abnormalities that included single or multiple gains and/or losses of chromosome(s), partial chromosome deletions and/or duplications in both euploid and aneuploid embryos. Transfer of normal euploid blastocysts in 34 cycles resulted in 58.8% clinical pregnancy and 54.4% implantation rates. Examination of abnormal blastocysts by FISH showed that all embryos had matching results comparing microarray and FISH analysis. The present study indicates that oligo microarray conducted with a higher resolution and a greater number of probes is able to detect not only aneuploidy, but also minor chromosomal abnormalities, such as partial chromosome deletion and/or duplication in human embryos. Preimplantation genetic screening of the aneuploidy by DNA microarray is an advanced technology used to select embryos for transfer and improved embryo implantation can be obtained after transfer of the screened normal embryos.

Citing Articles

Embryo biopsies for genomic selection in tropical dairy cattle.

Oliveira C, Camargo L, Silva M, Saraiva N, Quintao C, Machado M Anim Reprod. 2023; 20(2):e20230064.

PMID: 37547565 PMC: 10399131. DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0064.


Reanalysis of discarded blastocysts for autosomal aneuploidy after sex selection in cleavage-stage embryos.

Ebrahimian N, Montazeri F, Sadeghi M, Kalantar S, Gilany K, Khalili M Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2020; 47(4):293-299.

PMID: 33227189 PMC: 7711103. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2019.03426.


Does ICSI for in vitro fertilization cause more aneuploid embryos?.

Niu X, Long J, Gong F, Wang W Mol Cytogenet. 2020; 13:27.

PMID: 32636925 PMC: 7331232. DOI: 10.1186/s13039-020-00497-z.


Plasma-Derived Polyreactive Secretory-Like IgA and IgM Opsonizing Typhimurium Reduces Invasion and Gut Tissue Inflammation through Agglutination.

Bioley G, Monnerat J, Lotscher M, Vonarburg C, Zuercher A, Corthesy B Front Immunol. 2017; 8:1043.

PMID: 28900429 PMC: 5581814. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01043.


Aneuploidy analysis in day 7 human blastocysts produced by in vitro fertilization.

Su Y, Li J, Wang C, Haddad G, Wang W Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016; 14:20.

PMID: 27080232 PMC: 4832487. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0157-x.


References
1.
Johnson D, Cinnioglu C, Ross R, Filby A, Gemelos G, Hill M . Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010; 16(12):944-9. PMC: 2989828. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaq062. View

2.
Magli M, Montag M, Koster M, Muzi L, Geraedts J, Collins J . Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(11):3181-5. PMC: 3196879. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der295. View

3.
Clark M, Chen R, Lam H, Karczewski K, Chen R, Euskirchen G . Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29(10):908-14. PMC: 4127531. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1975. View

4.
Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohi J . Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(1):182-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg015. View

5.
Jones K . Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 14(2):143-58. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmm043. View