Regional Differences in Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Genetic Testing for Disease Risk and Ancestry

Overview

Journal Hum Genet

Specialty Genetics

Date 2010 Jun 16

PMID 20549517

Citations 24

Authors

Charles R Jonassaint

Eunice R Santos

Crystal M Glover

Perry W Payne

Grace-Ann Fasaye

Nefertiti Oji-Njideka

Stanley Hooker

Wenndy Hernandez

Morris W Foster

Rick A Kittles

Charmaine D Royal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Little is known about the lay public's awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing and what factors influence their perspectives. The existing literature focuses mainly on ethnic and socioeconomic differences; however, here we focus on how awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing differ by geographical regions in the US. We compared awareness and attitudes concerning genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry among 452 adults (41% Black and 67% female) in four major US cities, Norman, OK; Cincinnati, OH; Harlem, NY; and Washington, DC; prior to their participation in genetic ancestry testing. The OK participants reported more detail about their personal ancestries (p = 0.02) and valued ancestry testing over disease testing more than all other sites (p < 0.01). The NY participants were more likely than other sites to seek genetic testing for disease (p = 0.01) and to see benefit in finding out more about one's ancestry (p = 0.02), while the DC participants reported reading and hearing more about genetic testing for African ancestry than all other sites (p < 0.01). These site differences were not better accounted for by sex, age, education, self-reported ethnicity, religion, or previous experience with genetic testing/counseling. Regional differences in awareness and attitudes transcend traditional demographic predictors, such as ethnicity, age and education. Local sociocultural factors, more than ethnicity and socioeconomic status, may influence the public's awareness and belief systems, particularly with respect to genetics.

Citing Articles

Examining the Effects of PrEP Use on Sexual Behaviors and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Chinese Men who have Sex with Men: A Cross-Sectional Study.

She B, Lu F, Zhao R, Lin S, Sun J, He S AIDS Behav. 2024; 28(9):3128-3138.

PMID: 39066859 PMC: 11390884. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04398-9.

Future-proofing genomic data and consent management: a comprehensive review of technology innovations.

Oliva A, Kaphle A, Reguant R, Sng L, Twine N, Malakar Y Gigascience. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38837943 PMC: 11152178. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae021.

Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Alterations Are Associated with Tumor Mutational Burden and Survival of Immunotherapy.

Ito M, Kubo M, Kawaji H, Otsubo Y, Kurata K, Abutani H Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(23).

PMID: 38067312 PMC: 10705153. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235608.

Attitudes towards genetic testing: The role of genetic literacy, motivated cognition, and socio-demographic characteristics.

Likhanov M, Zakharov I, Awofala A, Ogundele O, Selita F, Kovas Y PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293187.

PMID: 37967060 PMC: 10651000. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293187.

Engagement marketing for social good: Application to the Research Program.

Lewis M, Uhrig J, Adams E, Brown J, Sanders A Front Genet. 2023; 13:889195.

PMID: 36993788 PMC: 10041337. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.889195.

References

Kaphingst K, McBride C . Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice. Semin Nephrol. 2010; 30(2):203-14. PMC: 2852315. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.01.011. View

Palmer C, Martinez A, Fox M, Sininger Y, Grody W, Schimmenti L . Ethnic differences in parental perceptions of genetic testing for deaf infants. J Genet Couns. 2007; 17(1):129-38. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9134-z. View

Guttmacher A, Collins F . Realizing the promise of genomics in biomedical research. JAMA. 2005; 294(11):1399-402. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1399. View

Condit C . What is 'public opinion' about genetics?. Nat Rev Genet. 2001; 2(10):811-5. DOI: 10.1038/35093580. View

Duster T . Lessons from history: why race and ethnicity have played a major role in biomedical research. J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(3):487-96, 479. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00060.x. View

Gamble V . Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(11):1773-8. PMC: 1381160. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.11.1773. View

Lakeman P, Plass A, Henneman L, Bezemer P, Cornel M, ten Kate L . Preconceptional ancestry-based carrier couple screening for cystic fibrosis and haemoglobinopathies: what determines the intention to participate or not and actual participation?. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 17(8):999-1009. PMC: 2986548. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.1. View

Priest S . US public opinion divided over biotechnology?. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(9):939-42. DOI: 10.1038/79412. View

Varcoe C, Browne A, Wong S, Smye V . Harms and benefits: collecting ethnicity data in a clinical context. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(9):1659-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.034. View

10.

Case A, Ramadhani T, Canfield M, Wicklund C . Awareness and attitudes regarding prenatal testing among Texas women of childbearing age. J Genet Couns. 2007; 16(5):655-61. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-007-9103-6. View

11.

Thompson H, Valdimarsdottir H, Jandorf L, Redd W . Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 51(3):217-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00219-7. View

12.

LANNIN D, Mathews H, Mitchell J, Swanson M, Swanson F, Edwards M . Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA. 1998; 279(22):1801-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.22.1801. View

13.

Halbert C, Kessler L, Stopfer J, Domchek S, Wileyto E . Low rates of acceptance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results among African American women at increased risk for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Genet Med. 2006; 8(9):576-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000237719.37908.54. View

14.

Einsiedel E . Cloning and its discontents-a Canadian perspective. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(9):943-4. DOI: 10.1038/79419. View

15.

Suther S, Kiros G . Barriers to the use of genetic testing: a study of racial and ethnic disparities. Genet Med. 2009; 11(9):655-62. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181ab22aa. View

16.

Gravlee C, Non A, Mulligan C . Genetic ancestry, social classification, and racial inequalities in blood pressure in Southeastern Puerto Rico. PLoS One. 2009; 4(9):e6821. PMC: 2731885. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006821. View

17.

Schwartz M, Hughes C, Roth J, Main D, Peshkin B, Isaacs C . Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000; 9(4):381-5. View

18.

Ge D, Fellay J, Thompson A, Simon J, Shianna K, Urban T . Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature. 2009; 461(7262):399-401. DOI: 10.1038/nature08309. View

19.

Hughes C, Fasaye G, LaSalle V, Finch C . Sociocultural influences on participation in genetic risk assessment and testing among African American women. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 51(2):107-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00179-9. View

20.

Wagner J . Interpreting the implications of DNA ancestry tests. Perspect Biol Med. 2010; 53(2):231-48. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.0.0158. View