» Articles » PMID: 37967060

Attitudes Towards Genetic Testing: The Role of Genetic Literacy, Motivated Cognition, and Socio-demographic Characteristics

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Nov 15
PMID 37967060
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding reasons for why people choose to have or not to have a genetic test is essential given the ever-increasing use of genetic technologies in everyday life. The present study explored the multiple drivers of people's attitudes towards genetic testing. Using the International Genetic Literacy and Attitudes Survey (iGLAS), we collected data on: (1) willingness to undergo testing; (2) genetic literacy; (3) motivated cognition; and (4) demographic and cultural characteristics. The 37 variables were explored in the largest to-date sample of 4311 participants from diverse demographic and cultural backgrounds. The results showed that 82% of participants were willing to undergo genetic testing for improved treatment; and over 73%-for research. The 35 predictor variables together explained only a small proportion of variance: 7%-in the willingness to test for Treatment; and 6%-for Research. The strongest predictors of willingness to undergo genetic testing were genetic knowledge and deterministic beliefs. Concerns about data misuse and about finding out unwanted health-related information were weakly negatively associated with willingness to undergo genetic testing. We also found some differences in factors linked to attitudes towards genetic testing across the countries included in this study. Our study demonstrates that decision-making regarding genetic testing is influenced by a large number of potentially interacting factors. Further research into these factors may help consumers to make decisions regarding genetic testing that are right for their specific circumstances.

Citing Articles

Strategies to Assess Risk for Hereditary Cancer in Primary Care Clinics: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Swisher E, Harris H, Knerr S, Theoryn T, Norquist B, Brant J JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(3):e250185.

PMID: 40053353 PMC: 11889468. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0185.


Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues.

Cornel M, van der Meij K, van El C, Rigter T, Henneman L Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(5).

PMID: 38790210 PMC: 11121342. DOI: 10.3390/genes15050581.

References
1.
Briscoe F, Ajunwa I, Gaddis A, McCormick J . Evolving public views on the value of one's DNA and expectations for genomic database governance: Results from a national survey. PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0229044. PMC: 7065739. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229044. View

2.
Webborn N, Williams A, McNamee M, Bouchard C, Pitsiladis Y, Ahmetov I . Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49(23):1486-91. PMC: 4680136. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095343. View

3.
Selzam S, Dale P, Wagner R, DeFries J, Cederlof M, OReilly P . Genome-Wide Polygenic Scores Predict Reading Performance Throughout the School Years. Sci Stud Read. 2017; 21(4):334-349. PMC: 5490720. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1299152. View

4.
Polderman T, Benyamin B, de Leeuw C, Sullivan P, van Bochoven A, Visscher P . Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(7):702-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3285. View

5.
Hamilton J, Shuk E, Arniella G, Javier Gonzalez C, Gold G, Gany F . Genetic Testing Awareness and Attitudes among Latinos: Exploring Shared Perceptions and Gender-Based Differences. Public Health Genomics. 2015; 19(1):34-46. PMC: 4706768. DOI: 10.1159/000441552. View