» Articles » PMID: 20542505

Effects of Semen Storage and Separation Techniques on Sperm DNA Fragmentation

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2010 Jun 15
PMID 20542505
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation.

Design: Controlled clinical study.

Setting: An assisted reproductive technology laboratory.

Patient(s): Thirty normoozospermic semen samples obtained from patients undergoing infertility evaluation.

Intervention(s): One aliquot from each sample was immediately prepared (control) for the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD). Aliquots used to assess storage techniques were treated in the following ways: snap frozen by liquid nitrogen immersion, slow frozen with Tris-yolk buffer and glycerol, kept on ice for 24 hours or maintained at room temperature for 4 and 24 hours. Aliquots used to assess separation techniques were processed by the following methods: washed and centrifuged in media, swim-up from washed sperm pellet, density gradient separation, density gradient followed by swim-up. DNA integrity was then measured by SCD.

Main Outcome Measure(s): DNA fragmentation as measured by SCD.

Result(s): There was no significant difference in fragmentation among the snap frozen, slow frozen, and wet-ice groups. Compared to other storage methods short-term storage at room temperature did not impact DNA fragmentation yet 24 hours storage significantly increased fragmentation. Swim-up, density gradient and density gradient/swim-up had significantly reduced DNA fragmentation levels compared with washed semen. Postincubation, density gradient/swim-up showed the lowest fragmentation levels.

Conclusion(s): The effect of sperm processing methods on DNA fragmentation should be considered when selecting storage or separation techniques for clinical use.

Citing Articles

Sperm DNA fragmentation and infertility: a narrative review.

Ziouziou I, Rambhatla A, Shah R, Agarwal A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):408.

PMID: 38990348 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05090-2.


Making immotile sperm motile using high-frequency ultrasound.

Vafaie A, Raveshi M, Devendran C, Nosrati R, Neild A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(7):eadk2864.

PMID: 38354240 PMC: 10866541. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk2864.


A comparison between the Felix™ electrophoretic system of sperm isolation and conventional density gradient centrifugation: a multicentre analysis.

Shapouri F, Mahendran T, Govindarajan M, Xie P, Kocur O, Palermo G J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 40(1):83-95.

PMID: 36515800 PMC: 9840737. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02680-0.


Extend the Survival of Human Sperm In Vitro in Non-Freezing Conditions: Damage Mechanisms, Preservation Technologies, and Clinical Applications.

Cheng Q, Li L, Jiang M, Liu B, Xian Y, Liu S Cells. 2022; 11(18).

PMID: 36139420 PMC: 9496714. DOI: 10.3390/cells11182845.


Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation.

Le M, Dang H, Nguyen T, Nguyen T, Nguyen Q, Cao N J Int Med Res. 2022; 50(5):3000605221097492.

PMID: 35545843 PMC: 9112774. DOI: 10.1177/03000605221097492.