Effects of Semen Storage and Separation Techniques on Sperm DNA Fragmentation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To determine the effect of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation.
Design: Controlled clinical study.
Setting: An assisted reproductive technology laboratory.
Patient(s): Thirty normoozospermic semen samples obtained from patients undergoing infertility evaluation.
Intervention(s): One aliquot from each sample was immediately prepared (control) for the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD). Aliquots used to assess storage techniques were treated in the following ways: snap frozen by liquid nitrogen immersion, slow frozen with Tris-yolk buffer and glycerol, kept on ice for 24 hours or maintained at room temperature for 4 and 24 hours. Aliquots used to assess separation techniques were processed by the following methods: washed and centrifuged in media, swim-up from washed sperm pellet, density gradient separation, density gradient followed by swim-up. DNA integrity was then measured by SCD.
Main Outcome Measure(s): DNA fragmentation as measured by SCD.
Result(s): There was no significant difference in fragmentation among the snap frozen, slow frozen, and wet-ice groups. Compared to other storage methods short-term storage at room temperature did not impact DNA fragmentation yet 24 hours storage significantly increased fragmentation. Swim-up, density gradient and density gradient/swim-up had significantly reduced DNA fragmentation levels compared with washed semen. Postincubation, density gradient/swim-up showed the lowest fragmentation levels.
Conclusion(s): The effect of sperm processing methods on DNA fragmentation should be considered when selecting storage or separation techniques for clinical use.
Sperm DNA fragmentation and infertility: a narrative review.
Ziouziou I, Rambhatla A, Shah R, Agarwal A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):408.
PMID: 38990348 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05090-2.
Making immotile sperm motile using high-frequency ultrasound.
Vafaie A, Raveshi M, Devendran C, Nosrati R, Neild A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(7):eadk2864.
PMID: 38354240 PMC: 10866541. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk2864.
Shapouri F, Mahendran T, Govindarajan M, Xie P, Kocur O, Palermo G J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 40(1):83-95.
PMID: 36515800 PMC: 9840737. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02680-0.
Cheng Q, Li L, Jiang M, Liu B, Xian Y, Liu S Cells. 2022; 11(18).
PMID: 36139420 PMC: 9496714. DOI: 10.3390/cells11182845.
Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation.
Le M, Dang H, Nguyen T, Nguyen T, Nguyen Q, Cao N J Int Med Res. 2022; 50(5):3000605221097492.
PMID: 35545843 PMC: 9112774. DOI: 10.1177/03000605221097492.