» Articles » PMID: 20526836

Comparison of Specificity and Sensitivity of Immunochemical and Molecular Techniques for Determination of Clavibacter Michiganensis Subsp. Michiganensis

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2010 Jun 8
PMID 20526836
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm), causing bacterial canker of tomato, was verified using PTA-ELISA and IFAS with PAbs of Neogen Europe Ltd. (UK), and with published and also laboratory-generated PCR primers from the Cmm tomatinase gene. The specificity of this technique was determined with 15 plant-pathogenic and 4 common, saprophytic bacteria. With IFAS, crossreactions were found for Pantoea dispersa, P. agglomerans and Rahnella aquatilis, and with PTA-ELISA for Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Pectobacterium atrosepticum and Dickeya sp. Cross-reactions with subspecies other than michiganensis were also found using both methods. Molecular methods were optimized by verification of annealing temperatures and times for both primers. Conditions were finally adjusted to 30 s at 65 degrees C for Dreier's and 10 s at 69 degrees C for our primer set. After this optimization, both primer pairs produced positive reaction only with Cmm. By means of PTA-ELISA and IFAS, Cmm strains were detected at a concentration up to 10(5) CFU/mL and 10(3) CFU/mL, respectively. The PCR test with bacterial cell suspensions reached a sensitivity of 10(3) CFU/mL with our designed primers and 104 CFU/mL with Dreier's primer pair.

Citing Articles

Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and pathogenic Xanthomonas species on tomato plants.

Penazova E, Dvorak M, Ragasova L, Kiss T, Pecenka J, cechova J PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227559.

PMID: 31910230 PMC: 6946519. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227559.


Multiplex PCR to detect four different tomato-infecting pathogens.

Quintero-Vasquez G, Bazan-Tejeda M, Martinez-Penafiel E, Kameyama-Kawabe L, Bermudez-Cruz R Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2012; 58(4):269-76.

PMID: 23135900 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-012-0206-6.

References
1.
Janse J, Kokoskova B . Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy for the detection and identification of plant pathogenic bacteria (in particular for Ralstonla solanacearum). Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 508:89-99. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-062-1_8. View

2.
Alvarez A . Integrated approaches for detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and diagnosis of bacterial diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004; 42:339-66. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140329. View

3.
Jahr H, Bahro R, Burger A, Ahlemeyer J, Eichenlaub R . Interactions between Clavibacter michiganensis and its host plants. Environ Microbiol. 2001; 1(2):113-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00011.x. View

4.
Henson J, French R . The polymerase chain reaction and plant disease diagnosis. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1993; 31:81-109. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.000501. View

5.
Kokoskova B, Mraz I, Hyblova J . Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of immunochemical and molecular techniques for reliable detection of Erwinia amylovora. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2007; 52(2):175-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF02932156. View