» Articles » PMID: 20498679

Dementia Risk Prediction in the Population: Are Screening Models Accurate?

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 May 26
PMID 20498679
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early identification of individuals at risk of dementia will become crucial when effective preventative strategies for this condition are developed. Various dementia prediction models have been proposed, including clinic-based criteria for mild cognitive impairment, and more-broadly constructed algorithms, which synthesize information from known dementia risk factors, such as poor cognition and health. Knowledge of the predictive accuracy of such models will be important if they are to be used in daily clinical practice or to screen the entire older population (individuals aged >or=65 years). This article presents an overview of recent progress in the development of dementia prediction models for use in population screening. In total, 25 articles relating to dementia risk screening met our inclusion criteria for review. Our evaluation of the predictive accuracy of each model shows that most are poor at discriminating at-risk individuals from not-at-risk cases. The best models incorporate diverse sources of information across multiple risk factors. Typically, poor accuracy is associated with single-factor models, long follow-up intervals and the outcome measure of all-cause dementia. A parsimonious and cost-effective consensus model needs to be developed that accurately identifies individuals with a high risk of future dementia.

Citing Articles

Disease-Specific Risk Models for Predicting Dementia: An Umbrella Review.

Tang E, Brain J, Sabatini S, Pakpahan E, Robinson L, Alshahrani M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598287 PMC: 11595746. DOI: 10.3390/life14111489.


Identifying individuals at high risk for dementia in primary care: Development and validation of the DemRisk risk prediction model using routinely collected patient data.

Reeves D, Morgan C, Stamate D, Ford E, Ashcroft D, Kontopantelis E PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0310712.

PMID: 39365767 PMC: 11452046. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310712.


Dementia risk prediction modelling in low- and middle-income countries: current state of evidence.

Alshahrani M, Sabatini S, Mohan D, Brain J, Pakpahan E, Tang E Front Epidemiol. 2024; 4:1397754.

PMID: 39359863 PMC: 11444985. DOI: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1397754.


Development and validation of a patient-level model to predict dementia across a network of observational databases.

John L, Fridgeirsson E, Kors J, Reps J, Williams R, Ryan P BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):308.

PMID: 39075527 PMC: 11288076. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03530-9.


What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review.

Brain J, Kafadar A, Errington L, Kirkley R, Tang E, Akyea R Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2024; 14(1):49-74.

PMID: 39015518 PMC: 11250535. DOI: 10.1159/000539744.


References
1.
Farias S, Mungas D, Reed B, Harvey D, DeCarli C . Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic- vs community-based cohorts. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66(9):1151-7. PMC: 2863139. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.106. View

2.
Nakata E, Kasai M, Kasuya M, Akanuma K, Meguro M, Ishii H . Combined memory and executive function tests can screen mild cognitive impairment and converters to dementia in a community: the Osaki-Tajiri project. Neuroepidemiology. 2009; 33(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1159/000222092. View

3.
Matthews F, Stephan B, Bond J, McKeith I, Brayne C . Operationalization of mild cognitive impairment: a graphical approach. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(10):1615-9. PMC: 2043006. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040304. View

4.
Levy R . Aging-associated cognitive decline. Working Party of the International Psychogeriatric Association in collaboration with the World Health Organization. Int Psychogeriatr. 1994; 6(1):63-8. View

5.
Busse A, Bischkopf J, Riedel-Heller S, Angermeyer M . Subclassifications for mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity. Psychol Med. 2003; 33(6):1029-38. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291703007839. View