» Articles » PMID: 20489639

Adherence Challenges in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Adolescents: Prevention and Intervention

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2010 May 22
PMID 20489639
Citations 144
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: Despite the availability of effective therapies, adolescents with type 1 diabetes demonstrate poorer adherence to treatment regimens compared with other pediatric age groups. Nonadherence is tightly linked to suboptimal glycemic control, increasing morbidity, and risk for premature mortality. This article will review barriers to adherence and discuss interventions that have shown promise in improving outcomes for this population.

Recent Findings: Adolescents face numerous obstacles to adherence, including developmental behaviors, flux in family dynamics, and perceived social pressures, which compound the relative insulin resistance brought on by pubertal physiology. Some successful interventions have relied on encouraging nonjudgmental family support in the daily tasks of blood glucose monitoring and insulin administration. Other interventions overcome these barriers through the use of motivational interviewing and problem-solving techniques, flexibility in dietary recommendations, and extending provider outreach and support with technology.

Summary: Effective interventions build on teens' internal and external supports (family, technology, and internal motivation) in order to simplify their management of diabetes and provide opportunities for the teens to share the burdens of care. Although such strategies help to minimize the demands placed upon teens with diabetes, suboptimal glycemic control will likely persist for the majority of adolescents until technological breakthroughs allow for automated insulin delivery in closed loop systems.

Citing Articles

Socio-cognitive determinants affecting insulin adherence/non-adherence in late adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.

AlBurno H, Francine S, de Vries H, Mohanadi D, Jongen S, Mercken L Health Psychol Rep. 2025; 13(1):1-26.

PMID: 40041295 PMC: 11873924. DOI: 10.5114/hpr/194439.


Health Equity Intervention for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and High Social Risk.

Stover-Kempers S, Torres K, Barry-Menkhaus S, Jenisch C, Spiro K, Harris M Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003302 PMC: 11854909. DOI: 10.3390/children12020200.


Hospitalisation rates for epilepsy, asthma and insulin-dependent diabetes in 796 190 school-aged children and young people with and without intellectual disabilities: a record-linkage cohort study.

Smith G, Fleming M, Cooper S, Henderson A, Pell J, Melville C BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e088809.

PMID: 39920076 PMC: 11843016. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088809.


Limitations of Using Mobile Phones for Managing Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Among Youth in Low and Middle-Income Countries: Implications for mHealth.

Wyche S, Olson J, Karanu M, Omondi E, Olonyo M Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2025; 8(CSCW2).

PMID: 39886256 PMC: 11780754. DOI: 10.1145/3687045.


Adolescents' Diabetes Self-Management Regimens and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.

Nguyen J, Le W, Brugger R, Shah A, Karur P, Hedelund M Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76343.

PMID: 39867016 PMC: 11761540. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76343.


References
1.
Nathan D, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(14):977-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. View

2.
Skinner T, John M, Hampson S . Social support and personal models of diabetes as predictors of self-care and well-being: a longitudinal study of adolescents with diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2000; 25(4):257-67. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/25.4.257. View

3.
Tamborlane W, Beck R, Bode B, Buckingham B, Peter Chase H, Clemons R . Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(14):1464-76. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. View

4.
Grey M, Boland E, Davidson M, Li J, Tamborlane W . Coping skills training for youth with diabetes mellitus has long-lasting effects on metabolic control and quality of life. J Pediatr. 2000; 137(1):107-13. DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2000.106568. View

5.
Howells L, Wilson A, Skinner T, Newton R, Morris A, Greene S . A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2002; 19(8):643-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x. View