» Articles » PMID: 19675206

Factors Predictive of Use and of Benefit from Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate factors associated with successful use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among participants with intensively treated type 1 diabetes in the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Randomized Clinical Trial.

Research Design And Methods: The 232 participants randomly assigned to the CGM group (165 with baseline A1C >or=7.0% and 67 with A1C <7.0%) were asked to use CGM on a daily basis. The associations of baseline factors and early CGM use with CGM use >or=6 days/week in the 6th month and with change in A1C from baseline to 6 months were evaluated in regression models.

Results: The only baseline factors found to be associated with greater CGM use in month 6 were age >or=25 years (P < 0.001) and more frequent self-reported prestudy blood glucose meter measurements per day (P < 0.001). CGM use and the percentage of CGM glucose values between 71 and 180 mg/dl during the 1st month were predictive of CGM use in month 6 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). More frequent CGM use was associated with a greater reduction in A1C from baseline to 6 months (P < 0.001), a finding present in all age-groups.

Conclusions: After 6 months, near-daily CGM use is more frequent in intensively treated adults with type 1 diabetes than in children and adolescents, although in all age-groups near-daily CGM use is associated with a similar reduction in A1C. Frequency of blood glucose meter monitoring and initial CGM use may help predict the likelihood of long-term CGM benefit in intensively treated patients with type 1 diabetes of all ages.

Citing Articles

International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024 Diabetes Technologies: Glucose Monitoring.

Tauschman M, Cardona-Hernandez R, DeSalvo D, Hood K, Laptev D, Lindholm Olinder A Horm Res Paediatr. 2025; 97(6):615-635.

PMID: 39884260 PMC: 11854985. DOI: 10.1159/000543156.


Demographic, Clinical, Psychosocial, and Behavioral Predictors of Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Morrow E, Spieker A, Greevy R, Roddy M, Mayberry L J Gen Intern Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39455481 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09101-1.


A Retrospective Cohort Study of Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Initiation and Meaningful Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.

Tremblay E, Bernique A, Garvey K, Astley C J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023; 18(6):1433-1444.

PMID: 37394962 PMC: 11531052. DOI: 10.1177/19322968231183985.


The Clinical Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring-a Digital Health App and Smartwatch Technology in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Scoping Review.

Diez Alvarez S, Fellas A, Santos D, Sculley D, Wynne K, Acharya S JMIR Diabetes. 2023; 8:e42389.

PMID: 36920464 PMC: 10131890. DOI: 10.2196/42389.


ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring.

Tauschmann M, Forlenza G, Hood K, Cardona-Hernandez R, Giani E, Hendrieckx C Pediatr Diabetes. 2022; 23(8):1390-1405.

PMID: 36537528 PMC: 10107687. DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13451.


References
1.
Wild D, von Maltzahn R, Brohan E, Christensen T, Clauson P, Gonder-Frederick L . A critical review of the literature on fear of hypoglycemia in diabetes: Implications for diabetes management and patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 68(1):10-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.003. View

2.
Polonsky W, Anderson B, Lohrer P, Welch G, Jacobson A, Aponte J . Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18(6):754-60. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.6.754. View

3.
Buckingham B, Xing D, Weinzimer S, Fiallo-Scharer R, Kollman C, Mauras N . Use of the DirecNet Applied Treatment Algorithm (DATA) for diabetes management with a real-time continuous glucose monitor (the FreeStyle Navigator). Pediatr Diabetes. 2008; 9(2):142-7. PMC: 2390770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00301.x. View

4.
Di Battista A, Hart T, Greco L, Gloizer J . Type 1 diabetes among adolescents: reduced diabetes self-care caused by social fear and fear of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Educ. 2009; 35(3):465-75. DOI: 10.1177/0145721709333492. View

5.
Tamborlane W, Beck R, Bode B, Buckingham B, Peter Chase H, Clemons R . Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(14):1464-76. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. View