» Articles » PMID: 20479296

Morphologic Features of Melanophages Under in Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy

Overview
Journal Arch Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2010 May 19
PMID 20479296
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To determine morphologic features of melanophages under in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and to highlight morphologic features that are important in distinguishing melanophages from melanocytes.

Design: Consecutive retrospective study.

Setting: Referral center for pigmented lesions.

Patients: The study group retrospectively constituted 20 consecutive patients having biopsy-proven lichen planus-like keratoses that dermoscopically and histopathologically showed many melanophages and that had been imaged under RCM before biopsy.

Main Outcome Measures: The RCM characteristics of isolated dermal bright cells were scored blinded to dermoscopic features and histopathologic diagnosis.

Results: Under RCM, melanophages were significantly smaller than melanocytes (mean [SD] cell diameter, 13.6 [1.6] vs 18.2 [2.9] microm, P = .006). Nuclei (intracellular low-reflectance round-oval structures) were visible in only 16% (29 of 184) of the cells in melanophages vs 57% (28 of 49) of the cells in melanocytes (P < .001). When identified, nuclei were smaller in melanophages than in melanocytes (mean [SD] diameter, 3.2 [1.2] vs 6.4 [0.7] microm, P < .001). Compared with melanocytes, melanophages were significantly more ill defined (76% [140 of 184] vs 18% [9 of 49], P < .001), less round (23% [42 of 184] vs 69% [34 of 49], P < .001), and less dendritic (1% [2 of 184] vs 12% [6 of 49]) (P = .001).

Conclusion: Observed differences in morphologic features should enable distinction between melanophages and melanocytes under RCM, thereby improving the accuracy of skin lesion diagnosis using this technique.

Citing Articles

Dual-Modal Near-Infrared Organic Nanoparticles: Integrating Mild Hyperthermia Phototherapy with Fluorescence Imaging.

Borlan R, Tudor M, Soritau O, Florea A, Pall E, Pop B Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:9071-9090.

PMID: 39253059 PMC: 11382802. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S472882.


Correlations between Histopathological and Confocal Reflectance Microscopy Aspects in a Patient with Bowenoid Papulosis.

Cozma E, Celarel A, Stoenica I, Lupu M, Banciu L, Voiculescu V Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37174923 PMC: 10177300. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13091531.


Co-localized line-field confocal optical coherence tomography and confocal Raman microspectroscopy for three-dimensional high-resolution morphological and molecular characterization of skin tissues .

Waszczuk L, Ogien J, Perrot J, Dubois A Biomed Opt Express. 2022; 13(4):2467-2487.

PMID: 35519243 PMC: 9045904. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.450993.


Complex management of lentigo maligna in the setting of chrysiasis, argyriasis, and tattoo using in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy.

Martin A, Melhoranse Gouveia B, Rawson R, Guitera P J Dermatol. 2022; 49(7):703-709.

PMID: 35514028 PMC: 9542206. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16390.


Dendritic cells in reflectance confocal microscopy are a clue for early melanoma diagnosis in extrafacial flat pigmented melanocytic lesions.

Guiducci L, Kaleci S, Chester J, Longo C, Ciardo S, Farnetani F Exp Dermatol. 2022; 31(7):1048-1055.

PMID: 35220636 PMC: 9542116. DOI: 10.1111/exd.14553.