» Articles » PMID: 20462322

Comparing Reading Speed for Horizontal and Vertical English Text

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2010 May 14
PMID 20462322
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are three formats for arranging English text for vertical reading-upright letters arranged vertically (marquee), and horizontal text rotated 90 degrees clockwise or counterclockwise. Previous research has shown that reading is slower for all three vertical formats than for horizontal text, with marquee being slowest (M. D. Byrne, 2002). It has been proposed that the size of the visual span-the number of letters recognized with high accuracy without moving the eyes-is a visual factor limiting reading speed. We predicted that reduced visual-span size would be correlated with the slower reading for the three vertical formats. We tested this prediction with uppercase and lowercase letters. Reading performance was measured using two presentation methods: RSVP (Rapid Serial Visual Presentation) and flashcard (a block of text on four lines). On average, reading speed for horizontal text was 139% faster than marquee text and 81% faster than the rotated texts. Size of the visual span was highly correlated with changes in reading speed for both lowercase and uppercase letters and for both RSVP and flashcard reading. Our results are consistent with the view that slower reading of vertical text is due to a decrease in the size of the visual span for vertical reading.

Citing Articles

The role of predictive and preview effects in Mongolian reading: evidence from eye movements.

Lu Z, Ri N, Jingxin W Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1420223.

PMID: 39346505 PMC: 11427253. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420223.


Customizing spatial remapping of letters to aid reading in the presence of a simulated central field loss.

Flowers C, Legge G, Engel S J Vis. 2024; 24(4):17.

PMID: 38635281 PMC: 11033602. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.4.17.


Vertical and horizontal reading training in patients with hemianopia and its effect on reading eye movements.

Kuester-Gruber S, Kabisch P, Cordey-Henke A, Martus P, Karnath H, Trauzettel-Klosinski S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3558.

PMID: 38347007 PMC: 10861552. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52618-y.


The Effect of Claustrophobic Tendencies on Digital Spatial Preferences.

Chung S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:874765.

PMID: 35814165 PMC: 9260385. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874765.


Eye movements in frontotemporal dementia: Abnormalities of fixation, saccades and anti-saccades.

Russell L, Greaves C, Convery R, Bocchetta M, Warren J, Kaski D Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022; 7(1):e12218.

PMID: 35005203 PMC: 8719345. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12218.


References
1.
Chung S, Legge G, Cheung S . Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning. Vision Res. 2004; 44(7):695-709. PMC: 2729075. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.028. View

2.
Legge G, Mansfield J, Chung S . Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Res. 2001; 41(6):725-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00295-9. View

3.
Lindstrom M, Bates D . Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics. 1990; 46(3):673-87. View

4.
Peli E . Control of eye movement with peripheral vision: implications for training of eccentric viewing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986; 63(2):113-8. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198602000-00006. View

5.
Perea M, Rosa E . Does "whole-word shape" play a role in visual word recognition?. Percept Psychophys. 2002; 64(5):785-94. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194745. View