» Articles » PMID: 20461040

Regional Myosin Heavy Chain Distribution in Selected Paraspinal Muscles

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 May 13
PMID 20461040
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Cross-sectional study with repeated measures design.

Objective: To compare the myosin heavy-chain isoform distribution within and between paraspinal muscles and to test the theory that fiber-type gradients exist as a function of paraspinal muscle depth.

Summary Of Background Data: There is still uncertainty regarding the fiber-type distributions within different paraspinal muscles. It has been previously proposed that deep fibers of the multifidus muscle may contain a higher ratio of type I to type II fibers, because, unlike superficial fibers, they primarily stabilize the spine, and may therefore have relatively higher endurance. Using a minimally invasive surgical approach, using tubular retractors that are placed within anatomic intermuscular planes, it was feasible to obtain biopsies from the multifidus, longissimus, iliocostalis, and psoas muscles at specific predefined depths.

Methods: Under an institutional review board-approved protocol, muscle biopsies were obtained from 15 patients who underwent minimally invasive spinal surgery, using the posterior paramedian (Wiltse) approach or the minimally invasive lateral approach. Myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform distribution was analyzed using SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) electrophoresis. Because multiple biopsies were obtained from each patient, MyHC distribution was compared using both within- and between-muscle repeated measures analyses.

Results: The fiber-type distribution was similar among the posterior paraspinal muscles and was composed of relatively high percentage of type I (63%), compared to type IIA (19%) and type IIX (18%) fibers. In contrast, the psoas muscle was found to contain a lower percentage of type I fibers (42%) and a higher percentage of type IIA (33%) and IIX fibers (26%; P<0.05). No significant difference was found for fiber-type distribution among 3 different depths of themultifidus and psoas muscles.

Conclusion: Fiber-type distribution between the posterior paraspinal muscles is consistent and is composed of relatively high percentage of type I fibers, consistent with a postural function. The psoas muscle, on the other hand, is composed of a higher percentage of type II fibers such as in the appendicular muscles. Our data do not support the idea of a fiber-type gradient as a function of depth for any muscle studied.

Citing Articles

Microscopic changes in the multifidus muscle in people with low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation.

Purushotham S, Hodson N, Greig C, Gardner A, Falla D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31927.

PMID: 39738508 PMC: 11686315. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83373-9.


Facet overhang: A novel parameter in the pathophysiology of multifidus muscle atrophy.

Chua M, Salame K, Khashan M, Ofir D, Hochberg U, Ankory R Clin Anat. 2022; 35(8):1123-1129.

PMID: 35701879 PMC: 9795881. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23923.


Mechanical Properties of Lumbar and Cervical Paravertebral Muscles in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Case-Control Study.

Garrido-Castro J, Aranda-Valera I, Pena-Amaro J, Martinez-Galisteo A, Gonzalez-Navas C, Rodrigues-de-Souza D Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(9).

PMID: 34574003 PMC: 8472659. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091662.


Regional differences between superficial and deep lumbar multifidus in patients with chronic lumbar spine pathology.

Padwal J, Berry D, Hubbard J, Zlomislic V, Allen R, Garfin S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):764.

PMID: 33218321 PMC: 7678325. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03791-4.


Cell populations and muscle fiber morphology associated with acute and chronic muscle degeneration in lumbar spine pathology.

Shahidi B, Gibbons M, Esparza M, Zlomislic V, Allen R, Garfin S JOR Spine. 2020; 3(2):e1087.

PMID: 32613162 PMC: 7323470. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1087.


References
1.
Holly L, Schwender J, Rouben D, Foley K . Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus. 2006; 20(3):E6. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.7. View

2.
MacDonald D, Moseley G, Hodges P . The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs?. Man Ther. 2006; 11(4):254-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2006.02.004. View

3.
Pereira SantAna J, Ennion S, Sargeant A, Moorman A, Goldspink G . Comparison of the molecular, antigenic and ATPase determinants of fast myosin heavy chains in rat and human: a single-fibre study. Pflugers Arch. 1998; 435(1):151-63. DOI: 10.1007/s004240050495. View

4.
Pette D, Spamer C . Metabolic properties of muscle fibers. Fed Proc. 1986; 45(13):2910-4. View

5.
Mattila M, Hurme M, Alaranta H, Paljarvi L, Kalimo H, Falck B . The multifidus muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation. A histochemical and morphometric analysis of intraoperative biopsies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(7):732-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198609000-00013. View