» Articles » PMID: 20440662

Cruciate-retaining TKA Using a Third-generation System with a Four-pegged Tibial Component: a Minimum 10-year Followup Note

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 May 5
PMID 20440662
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A third-generation TKA system was designed to address problems encountered with earlier designs including a high rate of patellofemoral complications. At a minimum of 5 years, we previously reported survivorship of 98.7% using revision for any reason as the endpoint for a cohort that includes the patients described in this report. That cohort was unique in that a tibial component that uses four short pegs for fixation was used in a subset of patients undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA and the tibial and femoral components were precoated with polymethylmethacrylate.

Questions/purposes: We now report the survival rate, postoperative function, complications, radiographic loosening, and osteolysis at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 161 patients who underwent 179 TKAs. The patella was resurfaced in all cases and all components were cemented. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for evidence of component loosening and osteolysis. Forty of the 161 patients (with 44 TKAs) had died and eight patients (nine knees) were lost to followup. For the remaining 113 patients (126 knees), the minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 11.7 years; range, 10.0-13.9 years).

Results: Survivorship at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening were 97.7% and 100%, respectively. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for periprosthetic fracture, and one for postoperative arthrofibrosis. There were no reoperations for patellar component maltracking, wear or loosening, tibiofemoral polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or aseptic loosening. Hospital for Special Surgery scores improved from a mean of 47.7 (range, 23-78) preoperatively to 85.4 (range, 33-100).

Conclusions: This cruciate-retaining design had a low risk of implant failure or revision and the design changes eliminated the patellar failures seen with earlier iterations at up to 10 years.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Does interaction occur between risk factors for revision total knee arthroplasty?.

Bounajem G, DeClercq J, Collett G, Ayers G, Jain N Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(12):5061-5070.

PMID: 37902892 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05107-2.


Higher Risk of Loosening for a Four-Pegged TKA Tibial Baseplate Than for a Stemmed One: A Register-based Study.

Robertsson O, Sundberg M, Sezgin E, Lidgren L, W-Dahl A Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 478(1):58-65.

PMID: 31135554 PMC: 7000052. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000774.


Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties using PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting implants in the same patients.

Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Sato J, Sakurai T, Toyabe S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 25(12):3711-3717.

PMID: 27139227 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4155-5.


Wear testing of moderate activities of daily living using in vivo measured knee joint loading.

Reinders J, Sonntag R, Vot L, Gibney C, Nowack M, Kretzer J PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0123155.

PMID: 25811996 PMC: 4374780. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123155.


Fibula head is a useful landmark to predict the location of posterior cruciate ligament footprint prior to total knee arthroplasty.

Jawhar A, Wasnik S, Scharf H, Roehl H Int Orthop. 2013; 38(2):267-72.

PMID: 24045910 PMC: 3923929. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2100-5.


References
1.
Fehring T, Murphy J, Hayes T, Roberts D, Pomeroy D, Griffin W . Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):40-50. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000148853.37270.67. View

2.
Sorger J, Federle D, Kirk P, Grood E, Cochran J, Levy M . The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 12(8):869-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90156-x. View

3.
Mariconda M, Lotti G, Milano C . Fracture of posterior-stablized tibial insert in a Genesis knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(4):529-30. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.4810. View

4.
Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S . Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(7):813-9. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34814. View

5.
Ma H, Lu Y, Kwok T, Ho F, Huang C, Huang C . The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(3):408-12. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18276. View