» Articles » PMID: 20428415

Application of NHG Guidelines in Patients Referred for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes

Overview
Journal Neth Heart J
Date 2010 Apr 30
PMID 20428415
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Purpose. Guidelines of the Dutch Association of General Practitioners (NHG) dictate the evaluation, treatment, and referral process of patients with stable chest pain syndromes (CPS). Adherence to this guideline was assessed in a consecutive group of patients referred to our hospital. Methods. We retrospectively studied the records of 296 subjects referred to our outpatient department in 2007 for evaluation of stable CPS. Referral letters were checked for completeness (past and present history, mentioning of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, physical examination, listing of medication) and used to judge adherence to the guideline. In a subset of patients, additional information regarding the referral process was gathered by telephone interview.Results. The referral letter was complete in only 67 patients (23%); items most often not reported were physical examination (63%) and cardiovascular risk factors (62%). Judging from the referral letter, 23 patients (8%) were evaluated in accordance with the NHG guideline prior to their referral. In patients in whom the final diagnosis of angina pectoris was made by the cardiologist, this was 20%. Seventy-nine patients were contacted by telephone after their work-up by the cardiologist; 36 of them (44%) reported being referred at their first visit to their primary physician, while 14 (18%) were referred at their own request.

Conclusion: Prior to referral, only a minority of patients with stable CPS were evaluated and treated in accordance with NHG guidelines. Furthermore, their referral letter was often incomplete. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:178-82.).

Citing Articles

Application of NHG guidelines in patients referred for stable chest pain syndromes.

Esselink A, de Ruiter A, Daniels M Neth Heart J. 2010; 18(4):178-82.

PMID: 20428415 PMC: 2856865. DOI: 10.1007/BF03091758.


Interdisciplinary assessment of adherence to guidelines: a bold step.

Peters R Neth Heart J. 2010; 18(4):176-7.

PMID: 20428414 PMC: 2856864. DOI: 10.1007/BF03091757.

References
1.
Nilsson S, Scheike M, Engblom D, Karlsson L, Molstad S, Akerlind I . Chest pain and ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 53(490):378-82. PMC: 1314597. View

2.
Filippi A, Gensini G, Bignanimi A, Sabatini A, Mazzaglia G, Cricelli C . Management of patients with suspected angina, but without known myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2004; 54(503):429-33. PMC: 1266201. View

3.
Ruzyllo W, Ponikowski P, Wilkins A . Clinical characteristics and methods of treatment of patients with stable coronary heart disease in the primary care settings--the results of the Polish, Multicentre Angina Treatment Pattern (ATP) study. Int J Clin Pract. 2005; 58(12):1127-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00234.x. View

4.
Wiest F, Bryson C, Burman M, McDonell M, Henikoff J, Fihn S . Suboptimal pharmacotherapeutic management of chronic stable angina in the primary care setting. Am J Med. 2004; 117(4):234-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.044. View

5.
Murphy N, Simpson C, Macintyre K, McAlister F, Chalmers J, McMurray J . Prevalence, incidence, primary care burden and medical treatment of angina in Scotland: age, sex and socioeconomic disparities: a population-based study. Heart. 2006; 92(8):1047-54. PMC: 1861126. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.069419. View