» Articles » PMID: 20421890

What Should Physicians Look for in Evaluating Prognostic Gene-expression Signatures?

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Apr 28
PMID 20421890
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most cancer treatments benefit only a minority of patients. This has led to a widespread interest in the identification of gene-expression-based prognostic signatures. Well-developed and validated genomic signatures can lead to personalized treatment decisions resulting in improved patient management. However, the pace of acceptance of these signatures in clinical practice has been slow. This is because many of the signatures have been developed without clear focus on the intended clinical use, and proper independent validation studies establishing their medical utility have rarely been performed. The practicing physician and the patient are thus left in doubt about the reliability and medical utility of the signatures. We aim to provide guidance to physicians in critically evaluating published studies on prognostic gene-expression signatures so that they are better equipped to decide which signatures, if any, have sufficient merit for use, in conjunction with other factors in helping their patients to make good treatment decisions. A discussion of the lessons to be learned from the successful development of the Oncotype DX genetic test for breast cancer is presented and contrasted with a review of the current status of prognostic gene-expression signatures in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Citing Articles

Exploring public cancer gene expression signatures across bulk, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data with signifinder Bioconductor package.

Pirrotta S, Masatti L, Bortolato A, Corra A, Pedrini F, Aere M NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024; 6(4):lqae138.

PMID: 39363890 PMC: 11447528. DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqae138.


Identification of a gene expression signature of vascular invasion and recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma via bulk and spatial transcriptomics.

Steiner D, Sultan L, Sullivan T, Liu H, Zhang S, LeClerc A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38915565 PMC: 11195124. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.07.597993.


A transcriptome study of p53-pathway related prognostic gene signature set in bladder cancer.

Khan S, Das T, Chakraborty S, Choudhury A, Karim H, Mostofa M Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e21058.

PMID: 37876438 PMC: 10590981. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21058.


ImmuneScore of eight-gene signature predicts prognosis and survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

Gu J, Wang Z, Wang B, Ma X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1097015.

PMID: 36937436 PMC: 10020521. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1097015.


Identification of a three-gene prognostic signature for radioresistant esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Wang X, Beeraka N, Xue N, Yu H, Yang Y, Liu M World J Clin Oncol. 2023; 14(1):13-26.

PMID: 36699628 PMC: 9850665. DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i1.13.


References
1.
Simon R . Clinical trial designs for evaluating the medical utility of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in oncology. Per Med. 2010; 7(1):33-47. PMC: 2851173. DOI: 10.2217/pme.09.49. View

2.
Gennari A, Sormani M, Pronzato P, Puntoni M, Colozza M, Pfeffer U . HER2 status and efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines in early breast cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 100(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm252. View

3.
Amado R, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman D . Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(10):1626-34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. View

4.
Couzin J . Diagnostics. Amid debate, gene-based cancer test approved. Science. 2007; 315(5814):924. DOI: 10.1126/science.315.5814.924. View

5.
Simon R, Wang S . Use of genomic signatures in therapeutics development in oncology and other diseases. Pharmacogenomics J. 2006; 6(3):166-73. DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500349. View