» Articles » PMID: 20421733

Understanding the Effect of Mean Pore Size on Cell Activity in Collagen-glycosaminoglycan Scaffolds

Overview
Journal Cell Adh Migr
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2010 Apr 28
PMID 20421733
Citations 141
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mean pore size is an essential aspect of scaffolds for tissue-engineering. If pores are too small cells cannot migrate in towards the center of the construct limiting the diffusion of nutrients and removal of waste products. Conversely, if pores are too large there is a decrease in specific surface area available limiting cell attachment. However the relationship between scaffold pore size and cell activity is poorly understood and as a result there are conflicting reports within the literature on the optimal pore size required for successful tissue-engineering. Previous studies in bone tissue-engineering have indicated a range of mean pore sizes (96–150 µm) to facilitate optimal attachment. Other studies have shown a need for large pores (300–800 µm) for successful bone growth in scaffolds. These conflicting results indicate that a balance must be established between obtaining optimal cell attachment and facilitating bone growth. In this commentary we discuss our recent investigations into the effect of mean pore size in collagen-glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffolds with pore sizes ranging from 85–325 μm and how it has provided an insight into the divergence within the literature.

Citing Articles

Progress of porous tantalum surface-modified biomaterial coatings in bone tissue engineering.

Liu A, Wang C, Zhao Z, Zhu R, Deng S, Zhang S J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025; 36(1):26.

PMID: 40042692 PMC: 11882692. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-025-06871-w.


Nano-hydroxyapatite/natural polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a brief review of recent trend.

Radha G, Manjubaashini N, Balakumar S In Vitro Model. 2025; 2(5):125-151.

PMID: 39872168 PMC: 11756495. DOI: 10.1007/s44164-023-00049-w.


Polycaprolactone for Hard Tissue Regeneration: Scaffold Design and In Vivo Implications.

Ramirez-Ruiz F, Nunez-Tapia I, Pina-Barba M, Alvarez-Perez M, Guarino V, Serrano-Bello J Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851320 PMC: 11759179. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010046.


High-throughput non-homogenous 3D polycaprolactone scaffold for cancer cell and cancer-associated fibroblast mini-tumors to evaluate drug treatment response.

Malakpour-Permlid A, Rodriguez M, Untracht G, Andersen P, Oredsson S, Boisen A Toxicol Rep. 2025; 14:101863.

PMID: 39758801 PMC: 11699757. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101863.


Advances of naturally derived biomedical polymers in tissue engineering.

Hu T, Fang J, Shen Y, Li M, Wang B, Xu Z Front Chem. 2024; 12:1469183.

PMID: 39635576 PMC: 11614639. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1469183.


References
1.
Harley B, Kim H, Zaman M, V Yannas I, Lauffenburger D, Gibson L . Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions. Biophys J. 2008; 95(8):4013-24. PMC: 2553126. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.122598. View

2.
Klawitter J, Bagwell J, Weinstein A, Sauer B . An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976; 10(2):311-23. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820100212. View

3.
OBrien F, Harley B, V Yannas I, Gibson L . Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2003; 25(6):1077-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00630-6. View

4.
Byrne E, Farrell E, McMahon L, Haugh M, OBrien F, Campbell V . Gene expression by marrow stromal cells in a porous collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold is affected by pore size and mechanical stimulation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008; 19(11):3455-63. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-008-3506-2. View

5.
Yannas I, Lee E, Orgill D, Skrabut E, Murphy G . Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(3):933-7. PMC: 286593. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.3.933. View