Markers of Bone Formation and Resorption Identify Subgroups of Patients with Clinical Knee Osteoarthritis Who Have Reduced Rates of Cartilage Loss
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To determine whether serum markers of bone formation and resorption, used individually or in combination, can be used to identify subgroups who lose cartilage volume at different rates over 2 years within a knee osteoarthritis (OA) population.
Methods: Changes in cartilage volume over 2 years were measured in 117 subjects with knee OA using magnetic resonance imaging. We examined relationships between change in cartilage volume and baseline serum markers of bone formation [intact N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and osteocalcin] and resorption [N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX-I), C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I), and C-telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP).
Results: The baseline markers of bone formation, PINP and osteocalcin (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, respectively), and the baseline markers of bone resorption, CTX-I and NTX-I (p = 0.02 for both), were significantly associated with reduced cartilage loss. There were no significant associations between baseline ratios of bone formation to resorption markers and cartilage loss. However, when subjects were divided into subgroups with high or low bone formation markers (based on levels of marker >or= mean or < mean for the population, respectively), in the subgroup with high PINP there was a significant association between increasing bone resorption markers CTX-I and NTX-I and reduced cartilage loss (p = 0.02, p = 0.001, respectively). Similarly, in the subgroup with high osteocalcin, there was a significant association between increasing CTX-I and NTX-I and reduced cartilage loss (p = 0.02, p = 0.003, respectively). In contrast, in subgroups with low bone formation markers, no significant associations were obtained between markers of bone resorption and cartilage loss.
Conclusion: Overall, the results suggest that higher bone remodeling (i.e., higher serum levels of bone formation and resorption) is associated with reduced cartilage loss. Considering markers of bone formation and resorption together, it is possible to identify subgroups within the OA population who have reduced rates of cartilage loss.
Lambova S Life (Basel). 2023; 13(1).
PMID: 36676089 PMC: 9866724. DOI: 10.3390/life13010140.
Jarecki J, Malecka-Masalska T, Kosior-Jarecka E, Widuchowski W, Krasowski P, Gutbier M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).
PMID: 35329213 PMC: 8953048. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063530.
Lee Y, Briggs M, Condina M, Puddy H, Anderson P, Hoffmann P Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(17).
PMID: 32899238 PMC: 7503948. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176414.
Chin K, Wong S, Japar Sidik F, Abdul Hamid J, Abas N, Ramli E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(16).
PMID: 31412648 PMC: 6720523. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162897.
Nelson A, Fang F, Arbeeva L, Cleveland R, Schwartz T, Callahan L Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019; 27(7):994-1001.
PMID: 31002938 PMC: 6579689. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.027.