» Articles » PMID: 20375999

Integration of Genetic, Clinical, and INR Data to Refine Warfarin Dosing

Abstract

Well-characterized genes that affect warfarin metabolism (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9) and sensitivity (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1)) explain one-third of the variability in therapeutic dose before the international normalized ratio (INR) is measured. To determine genotypic relevance after INR becomes available, we derived clinical and pharmacogenetic refinement algorithms on the basis of INR values (on day 4 or 5 of therapy), clinical factors, and genotype. After adjusting for INR, CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes remained significant predictors (P < 0.001) of warfarin dose. The clinical algorithm had an R(2) of 48% (median absolute error (MAE): 7.0 mg/week) and the pharmacogenetic algorithm had an R(2) of 63% (MAE: 5.5 mg/week) in the derivation set (N = 969). In independent validation sets, the R(2) was 26-43% with the clinical algorithm and 42-58% when genotype was added (P = 0.002). After several days of therapy, a pharmacogenetic algorithm estimates the therapeutic warfarin dose more accurately than one using clinical factors and INR response alone.

Citing Articles

Comparative performance of pharmacogenetics-based warfarin dosing algorithms in Chinese population: use of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to explore dosing regimen through clinical trial simulation.

Shi K, Deng J Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2024; 34(9):275-284.

PMID: 39356590 PMC: 11424055. DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000545.


Construction of warfarin population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics model in Han population based on Bayesian method.

Xia X, Cai X, Chen J, Jiang S, Zhang J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14846.

PMID: 38937509 PMC: 11211351. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65048-7.


Application of a warfarin dosing calculator to guide individualized dosing empirical adjustment after fixed dosing: a pilot study.

Cai X, Chen J, Chen M, Xia X, Fang G, Zhang J Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1235331.

PMID: 37663245 PMC: 10469691. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1235331.


Validation and comparison between two warfarin dosing clinical algorithms and warfarin fixed dosing in specialized heart center: cross-sectional study.

Elnour A, Ahmed I, Khalid A, Elmustafa M Pharm Pract (Granada). 2023; 20(3):2722.

PMID: 36733524 PMC: 9851814. DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.3.2722.


Long Short-Term Memory Network for Development and Simulation of Warfarin Dosing Model Based on Time Series Anticoagulant Data.

Kuang Y, Liu Y, Pei Q, Ning X, Zou Y, Liu L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:881111.

PMID: 35647078 PMC: 9130657. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.881111.


References
1.
Gage B, Eby C, E Milligan P, Banet G, Duncan J, McLeod H . Use of pharmacogenetics and clinical factors to predict the maintenance dose of warfarin. Thromb Haemost. 2003; 91(1):87-94. DOI: 10.1160/TH03-06-0379. View

2.
Wu A . Use of genetic and nongenetic factors in warfarin dosing algorithms. Pharmacogenomics. 2008; 8(7):851-61. DOI: 10.2217/14622416.8.7.851. View

3.
Budnitz D, Pollock D, Weidenbach K, Mendelsohn A, Schroeder T, Annest J . National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events. JAMA. 2006; 296(15):1858-66. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1858. View

4.
Harrison L, Johnston M, Massicotte M, Crowther M, Moffat K, Hirsh J . Comparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126(2):133-6. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-2-199701150-00006. View

5.
Ageno W, Turpie A . Exaggerated initial response to warfarin following heart valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84(8):905-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00463-4. View