Consumer Perceptions of Pork Eating Quality As Affected by Pork Quality Attributes and End-point Cooked Temperature
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The study evaluated the interactive and individual effects of fresh pork loin (n=679) ultimate pH (pH), intramuscular fat (IMF), Minolta L* color (L*), Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS), and four cooked temperatures (62.8 degrees C, 68.3 degrees C, 73.9 degrees C, and 79.4 degrees C) on consumer (n=2280) perception of eating quality (n=13,265 observations). Data were analyzed using ordered logistical regression. Predicted mean responses were consistently near or under five on the 1-8-point end-anchored scale, indicating a neutral perception of pork eating quality regardless of fresh quality or cooked temperature. Responses improved as IMF and pH increased and WBS decreased, whereas L* did not contribute significantly to variation in responses. Increasing IMF resulted in a very small incremental improvement in responses, but was of practical size only when comparing the least (1%) to the greatest (6%) levels. Loin pH and WBS were primary contributors to consumer perceptions, whereby an incremental increase in pH (0.20 unit) and decrease in WBS (4.9 N) resulted in a 4-5% reduction in the proportion of consumers rating pork as >or= 6 (favorable) on the 8-point scale. No interactions between quality and temperature effects were observed. Increased cooked temperature was negatively (P<0.05) associated with Overall-Like and Tenderness ratings, but the incremental effect was small. Juiciness-Like and Level responses decreased by 0.50 units as temperature increased across the range. Consumer responses favor pork with lower WBS, greater pH and IMF, and pork cooked to a lower temperature.
Rearing hogs on pasture minimally impacts pork composition.
Becker C, Campbell J, Soder K, Hines E Transl Anim Sci. 2024; 8:txae114.
PMID: 39156963 PMC: 11329800. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txae114.
Zhao Z, Wu J, Yao X, Sun H, Wu Y, Zhou H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(13).
PMID: 38998099 PMC: 11240572. DOI: 10.3390/ani14131987.
Impact of the leptin receptor gene on pig performance and quality traits.
Suarez-Mesa R, Ros-Freixedes R, Pena R, Reixach J, Estany J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10652.
PMID: 38730110 PMC: 11087582. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61509-1.
Wang B, Hou L, Yang W, Men X, Qi K, Xu Z Front Genet. 2024; 15:1351429.
PMID: 38415055 PMC: 10897757. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1351429.
Zhang S, Chen Y, Liu W, Liu B, Zhou X Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(11).
PMID: 37299862 PMC: 10255884. DOI: 10.3390/s23115135.