Will Decreasing Assisted Reproduction Technology Costs Improve Utilization and Outcomes Among Minority Women?

Overview

Journal Fertil Steril

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2010 Apr 2

PMID 20356585

Citations 14

Authors

Desiree M McCarthy-Keith

Enrique F Schisterman

Randal D Robinson

Kathleen OLeary

Richard S Lucidi

Alicia Y Armstrong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate assisted reproduction technology (ART) usage and outcomes in minority women seeking care at enhanced access, military ART programs.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Federal ART programs.

Patient(s): Two thousand fifty women undergoing first cycle, fresh, nondonor ART from 2000 to 2005.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Rate of ART use, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate.

Result(s): African American women had an almost fourfold increased use of ART and Hispanic women had decreased use. Clinical pregnancy rates were significantly lower for African American women compared with white women (46.1% vs. 52.6%, relative risk [RR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.99) as were live birth rates (33.7%. vs. 45.7%, RR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91).

Conclusion(s): Economics appear to influence ART use by African American women but not Hispanic women. Despite increased use by African American women, outcomes in this group were worse when compared with Caucasian women. Improving access through decreased cost may increase use by some but not all minority groups. Improved access may not translate into improved outcomes in some ethnic groups.

Citing Articles

Do reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship websites reflect a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion?.

Eliwa J, Goedecke P, Wan J, Weinerman R, Findley J, Flyckt R F S Rep. 2025; 5(4):411-416.

PMID: 39781083 PMC: 11705575. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.08.005.

The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions.

Fotovati M, Badeghiesh A, Baghlaf H, Dahan M AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(2):100329.

PMID: 38919707 PMC: 11197111. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100329.

Educational gradients in the prevalence of medically assisted reproduction births in a comparative perspective.

Goisis A, Fallesen P, Seiz M, Salazar L, Eremenko T, Cozzani M Fertil Steril. 2024; 122(4):648-657.

PMID: 38768747 PMC: 11452323. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.05.149.

Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade.

Mahabamunuge J, Seifer D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673497 PMC: 11050514. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082224.

Strong social disparities in access to IVF/ICSI despite free cost of treatment: a French population-based nationwide cohort study.

Ben Messaoud K, Guibert J, Bouyer J, de La Rochebrochard E BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):621.

PMID: 37993813 PMC: 10664362. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02784-4.

References

Inhorn M, Fakih M . Arab Americans, African Americans, and infertility: barriers to reproduction and medical care. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(4):844-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.029. View

Feinberg E, Larsen F, Catherino W, Zhang J, Armstrong A . Comparison of assisted reproductive technology utilization and outcomes between Caucasian and African American patients in an equal-access-to-care setting. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(4):888-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.028. View

Dayal M, Gindoff P, Dubey A, Spitzer T, Bergin A, Peak D . Does ethnicity influence in vitro fertilization (IVF) birth outcomes?. Fertil Steril. 2008; 91(6):2414-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.055. View

Bitler M, Schmidt L . Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(4):858-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.038. View

Reynolds M, Schieve L, Jeng G, Peterson H . Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(1):16-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00572-7. View

Nachtigall R, Castrillo M, Shah N, Turner D, Harrington J, Jackson R . The challenge of providing infertility services to a low-income immigrant Latino population. Fertil Steril. 2008; 92(1):116-23. PMC: 2722953. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.037. View

Sharara F, McClamrock H . Differences in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome between white and black women in an inner-city, university-based IVF program. Fertil Steril. 2000; 73(6):1170-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00524-0. View

Fujimoto V, Luke B, Brown M, Jain T, Armstrong A, Grainger D . Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2008; 93(2):382-90. PMC: 4786183. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.061. View

Nichols Jr J, Higdon 3rd H, Crane 4th M, Boone W . Comparison of implantation and pregnancy rates in African American and white women in an assisted reproductive technology practice. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(1):80-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01853-2. View

10.

Jain T, D Hornstein M . To pay or not to pay. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80(1):27-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00576-4. View

11.

Seifer D, Frazier L, Grainger D . Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women. Fertil Steril. 2007; 90(5):1701-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.024. View

12.

Chandra A, Martinez G, Mosher W, Abma J, Jones J . Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23. 2006; (25):1-160. View

13.

Bendikson K, Cramer D, Vitonis A, Hornstein M . Ethnic background and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 88(3):342-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.022. View

14.

Feinberg E, Larsen F, Wah R, Alvero R, Armstrong A . Economics may not explain Hispanic underutilization of assisted reproductive technology services. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88(5):1439-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.031. View

15.

Jain T, Harlow B, D Hornstein M . Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(9):661-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa013491. View

16.

Henne M, Bundorf M . Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril. 2007; 89(1):66-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.167. View

17.

Chambers G, Sullivan E, Ishihara O, Chapman M, Adamson G . The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(6):2281-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029. View

18.

Jain T . Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(4):876-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1338. View

19.

Becker G, Castrillo M, Jackson R, Nachtigall R . Infertility among low-income Latinos. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(4):882-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.052. View