» Articles » PMID: 20331886

Comparing Public and Private Hospitals in China: Evidence from Guangdong

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2010 Mar 25
PMID 20331886
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The literature comparing private not-for-profit, for-profit, and government providers mostly relies on empirical evidence from high-income and established market economies. Studies from developing and transitional economies remain scarce, especially regarding patient case-mix and quality of care in public and private hospitals, even though countries such as China have expanded a mixed-ownership approach to service delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the operations and performance of public and private hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, focusing on differences in patient case-mix and quality of care.

Methods: We analyze survey data collected from 362 government-owned and private hospitals in Guangdong Province in 2005, combining mandatorily reported administrative data with a survey instrument designed for this study. We use univariate and multi-variate regression analyses to compare hospital characteristics and to identify factors associated with simple measures of structural quality and patient outcomes.

Results: Compared to private hospitals, government hospitals have a higher average value of total assets, more pieces of expensive medical equipment, more employees, and more physicians (controlling for hospital beds, urban location, insurance network, and university affiliation). Government and for-profit private hospitals do not statistically differ in total staffing, although for-profits have proportionally more support staff and fewer medical professionals. Mortality rates for non-government non-profit and for-profit hospitals do not statistically differ from those of government hospitals of similar size, accreditation level, and patient mix.

Conclusions: In combination with other evidence on health service delivery in China, our results suggest that changes in ownership type alone are unlikely to dramatically improve or harm overall quality. System incentives need to be designed to reward desired hospital performance and protect vulnerable patients, regardless of hospital ownership type.

Citing Articles

Does privatization decrease the structural efficiency in the Chinese hospital sector?.

He X, Liu Y Health Econ Rev. 2025; 15(1):5.

PMID: 39890675 PMC: 11786494. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00568-6.


Comparing the Quality of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Dominated and Delivered by Public and Private Sector Platforms in China: Standardized Patient Study.

Song F, Gong X, Yang Y, Guo R J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e55400.

PMID: 39541582 PMC: 11605261. DOI: 10.2196/55400.


Evaluating private hospital performance before and during COVID-19 in China.

Wang X, Xu J Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(21):e38327.

PMID: 38787968 PMC: 11124748. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038327.


Incentive policy for the comprehensive development of young medical talents: an evolutionary game study.

Li S, He L, Huang Y, Wang D, Zhu W, Chen Z Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1325166.

PMID: 38371237 PMC: 10869509. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1325166.


Rapid growth of private hospitals in China: emerging challenges and opportunities to health sector management.

Zhang X, Zimmerman A, Zhang Y, Ogbuoji O, Tang S Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023; 44:100991.

PMID: 38156262 PMC: 10753080. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100991.


References
1.
Montagu D . Franchising of health services in low-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2002; 17(2):121-30. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/17.2.121. View

2.
Thomas J, Holloway J, Guire K . Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator for quality of care. Inquiry. 1993; 30(1):6-22. View

3.
Hanson K, Berman P . Private health care provision in developing countries: a preliminary analysis of levels and composition. Health Policy Plan. 1998; 13(3):195-211. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/13.3.195. View

4.
Palmer N, Mills A . Classical versus relational approaches to understanding controls on a contract with independent GPs in South Africa. Health Econ. 2003; 12(12):1005-20. DOI: 10.1002/hec.792. View

5.
Eggleston K, Ling L, Qingyue M, Lindelow M, Wagstaff A . Health service delivery in China: a literature review. Health Econ. 2007; 17(2):149-65. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1306. View