» Articles » PMID: 20306490

Backbone Additivity in the Transfer Model of Protein Solvation

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Mar 23
PMID 20306490
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The transfer model implying additivity of the peptide backbone free energy of transfer is computationally tested. Molecular dynamics simulations are used to determine the extent of change in transfer free energy (DeltaG(tr)) with increase in chain length of oligoglycine with capped end groups. Solvation free energies of oligoglycine models of varying lengths in pure water and in the osmolyte solutions, 2M urea and 2M trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), were calculated from simulations of all atom models, and DeltaG(tr) values for peptide backbone transfer from water to the osmolyte solutions were determined. The results show that the transfer free energies change linearly with increasing chain length, demonstrating the principle of additivity, and provide values in reasonable agreement with experiment. The peptide backbone transfer free energy contributions arise from van der Waals interactions in the case of transfer to urea, but from electrostatics on transfer to TMAO solution. The simulations used here allow for the calculation of the solvation and transfer free energy of longer oligoglycine models to be evaluated than is currently possible through experiment. The peptide backbone unit computed transfer free energy of -54 cal/mol/M compares quite favorably with -43 cal/mol/M determined experimentally.

Citing Articles

Systematic enhancement of protein crystallization efficiency by bulk lysine-to-arginine (KR) substitution.

Banayan N, Loughlin B, Singh S, Forouhar F, Lu G, Wong K Protein Sci. 2024; 33(3):e4898.

PMID: 38358135 PMC: 10868448. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4898.


Recent advances in understanding the role of proteostasis.

Verma K, Verma M, Chaphalkar A, Chakraborty K Fac Rev. 2021; 10:72.

PMID: 34632458 PMC: 8483240. DOI: 10.12703/r/10-72.


Dynamical Model for the Counteracting Effects of Trimethylamine -Oxide on Urea in Aqueous Solutions under Pressure.

Teng X, Ichiye T J Phys Chem B. 2020; 124(10):1978-1986.

PMID: 32059113 PMC: 8886402. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10844.


Free Energy Calculations Based on Coupling Proximal Distribution Functions and Thermodynamic Cycles.

Ou S, Pettitt B J Chem Theory Comput. 2019; 15(4):2649-2658.

PMID: 30768893 PMC: 6519071. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01157.


Improvements to the ABSINTH Force Field for Proteins Based on Experimentally Derived Amino Acid Specific Backbone Conformational Statistics.

Choi J, Pappu R J Chem Theory Comput. 2019; 15(2):1367-1382.

PMID: 30633502 PMC: 10749164. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00573.


References
1.
Nozaki Y, Tanford C . THE SOLUBILITY OF AMINO ACIDS AND RELATED COMPOUNDS IN AQUEOUS UREA SOLUTIONS. J Biol Chem. 1963; 238:4074-81. View

2.
Paul S, Patey G . Why tert-butyl alcohol associates in aqueous solution but trimethylamine-N-oxide does not. J Phys Chem B. 2006; 110(21):10514-8. DOI: 10.1021/jp0609378. View

3.
Sinibaldi R, Casieri C, Melchionna S, Onori G, Segre A, Viel S . The role of water coordination in binary mixtures. A study of two model amphiphilic molecules in aqueous solutions by molecular dynamics and NMR. J Phys Chem B. 2006; 110(17):8885-92. DOI: 10.1021/jp056897+. View

4.
Kokubo H, Pettitt B . Preferential solvation in urea solutions at different concentrations: properties from simulation studies. J Phys Chem B. 2007; 111(19):5233-42. PMC: 2583237. DOI: 10.1021/jp067659x. View

5.
OBrien E, Dima R, Brooks B, Thirumalai D . Interactions between hydrophobic and ionic solutes in aqueous guanidinium chloride and urea solutions: lessons for protein denaturation mechanism. J Am Chem Soc. 2007; 129(23):7346-53. DOI: 10.1021/ja069232+. View