» Articles » PMID: 17447807

Preferential Solvation in Urea Solutions at Different Concentrations: Properties from Simulation Studies

Overview
Journal J Phys Chem B
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2007 Apr 24
PMID 17447807
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed molecular dynamics simulations of urea solutions at different concentrations with two urea models (OPLS and KBFF) to examine the structures responsible for the thermodynamic solution properties. Our simulation results showed that hydrogen-bonding properties such as the average number of hydrogen bonds and their lifetime distributions were nearly constant at all concentrations between infinite dilution and the solubility limit. This implies that the characterization of urea-water solutions in the molarity concentration scale as nearly ideal is a result of facile local hydrogen bonding rather than a global property. Thus, urea concentration does not influence the local propensity for hydrogen bonds, only how they are satisfied. By comparison, the KBFF model of urea donated fewer hydrogen bonds than OPLS. We found that the KBFF urea model in TIP3P water better reproduced the experimental density and diffusion constant data. Preferential solvation analysis showed that there were weak urea-urea and water-water associations in OPLS solution at short distances, but there were no strong associations. We divided urea molecules into large, medium, and small clusters to examine fluctuation properties and found that any particular urea molecule did not stay in the same cluster for a long time. We found neither persistent nor large clusters.

Citing Articles

Assessment of GAFF and OPLS Force Fields for Urea: Crystal and Aqueous Solution Properties.

Anker S, McKechnie D, Mulheran P, Sefcik J, Johnston K Cryst Growth Des. 2024; 24(1):143-158.

PMID: 38188266 PMC: 10767702. DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00785.


Mechanism of Osmolyte Stabilization-Destabilization of Proteins: Experimental Evidence.

Stasiulewicz M, Panuszko A, Bruzdziak P, Stangret J J Phys Chem B. 2022; 126(16):2990-2999.

PMID: 35441516 PMC: 9059127. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00281.


Perfluorooctanoate in Aqueous Urea Solutions: Micelle Formation, Structure, and Microenvironment.

Kancharla S, Canales E, Alexandridis P Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(22).

PMID: 31744078 PMC: 6888096. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20225761.


Contrasting Effects of Guanidinium Chloride and Urea on the Activity and Unfolding of Lysozyme.

Biswas B, Muttathukattil A, Reddy G, Singh P ACS Omega. 2019; 3(10):14119-14126.

PMID: 31458105 PMC: 6644995. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01911.


Crowding in Cellular Environments at an Atomistic Level from Computer Simulations.

Feig M, Yu I, Wang P, Nawrocki G, Sugita Y J Phys Chem B. 2017; 121(34):8009-8025.

PMID: 28666087 PMC: 5582368. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b03570.


References
1.
Dashnau J, Nucci N, Sharp K, Vanderkooi J . Hydrogen bonding and the cryoprotective properties of glycerol/water mixtures. J Phys Chem B. 2006; 110(27):13670-7. DOI: 10.1021/jp0618680. View

2.
Bennion B, Daggett V . The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(9):5142-7. PMC: 154312. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0930122100. View

3.
Wright W, Guffanti G, Vanderkooi J . Protein in sugar films and in glycerol/water as examined by infrared spectroscopy and by the fluorescence and phosphorescence of tryptophan. Biophys J. 2003; 85(3):1980-95. PMC: 1303370. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74626-8. View

4.
SCHELLMAN J . The thermodynamic stability of proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1987; 16:115-37. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.16.060187.000555. View

5.
Timasheff S . The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes?. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993; 22:67-97. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.000435. View