» Articles » PMID: 20306289

The Importance of Using the Correct Bounds on the Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement when Multiple Measurements Are Recorded Per Patient

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Mar 23
PMID 20306289
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The limits of agreement originally derived by Bland and Altman (Lancet i:307-310, 1986) are the most commonly used method for investigating statistical agreement between two medical devices. Bland and Altman describe a confidence interval for these limits that should always accompany the limits themselves. However, this interval presumes that the recorded differences between the two devices in question are independent. This is a reasonable assumption when only one measurement is recorded per device per patient. Bland and Altman (StatMethods Med Res 8:135-160, 1999) subsequently derived bounds for the more general case where multiple observations are recorded within each patient. Unfortunately, in practice, the bounds assuming independence are typically reported when in fact the repeated measures bounds are more appropriate. This communication illustrates the dangers of using the "original" (independence-based) bounds derived in Bland and Altman (Lancet i:307-310, 1986) in the presence of repeated measures per patient.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Photoplethysmography-Based Monitoring of Respiration Rate During High-Intensity Interval Training: Implications for Healthcare Monitoring.

Muller M, Ebrahimkheil K, Vijgeboom T, van Eijck C, Ronner E Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 39727896 PMC: 11674237. DOI: 10.3390/bios14120631.


Evaluation of photoplethysmography-based monitoring of pulse rate, interbeat-intervals, and oxygen saturation during high-intensity interval training.

Vijgeboom T, Muller M, Ebrahimkheil K, van Eijck C, Ronner E Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):114.

PMID: 39529038 PMC: 11552347. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01309-w.


Accuracy of Self-Injection Locking Radar System for Vital Signs Detection During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Hospital in Taiwan: Measuring Vital Signs Accurately with SIL Radar for Hospital Healthcare.

Tzou S, Chen I, Chu T, Chian D, Wang F, Lee Y Med Sci Monit. 2023; 29:e939949.

PMID: 37183387 PMC: 10197972. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939949.


Validation of Heart Rate Extracted From Wrist-Based Photoplethysmography in the Perioperative Setting: Prospective Observational Study.

Mestrom E, Deneer R, Bonomi A, Margarito J, Gelissen J, Haakma R JMIR Cardio. 2021; 5(2):e27765.

PMID: 34734834 PMC: 8603171. DOI: 10.2196/27765.


Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sanders M, Servaas S, Slagt C J Clin Monit Comput. 2019; 34(3):433-460.

PMID: 31175501 PMC: 7205855. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00330-y.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

2.
Hamilton C, Stamey J . Using a prediction approach to assess agreement between two continuous measurements. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009; 23(5):311-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9198-4. View

3.
Bland J, Altman D . Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007; 17(4):571-82. DOI: 10.1080/10543400701329422. View

4.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

5.
Barnhart H, Haber M, Lin L . An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements. J Biopharm Stat. 2007; 17(4):529-69. DOI: 10.1080/10543400701376480. View