» Articles » PMID: 20304433

Risk Stratification of Men Choosing Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Mar 23
PMID 20304433
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We sought to predict biopsy progression in men on prostate cancer surveillance.

Materials And Methods: A total of 376 men with a median age of 65.5 years (range 45.8 to 79.5) with low risk prostate cancer on surveillance underwent at least 1 followup biopsy after diagnosis. Progression was defined at surveillance biopsy as Gleason pattern 4 or 5, greater than 2 biopsy cores with cancer or greater than 50% involvement of any core with cancer. Proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate the association between covariates and progression at surveillance biopsy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of disease progression.

Results: Of the 376 men 123 (32.7%) had progression a median of 5.6 years (range 0.3 to 8.5) after diagnosis. Percent free PSA and maximum percent core involvement at diagnosis were associated with progression, allowing stratification of the progression risk at initial surveillance biopsy. Cancer presence and PSA density at initial surveillance biopsy were associated with subsequent progression, allowing stratification of the cumulative incidence of progression 3 years after initial surveillance biopsy (cumulative incidence 11.1%, 95% CI 4.7 to 25.2 for negative biopsy and PSAD less than 0.08 ng/ml/cm(3) vs 53.6%, 95% CI 38.6 to 70.0 for positive biopsy and PSAD 0.08 ng/ml/cm(3) or greater, log rank test p <0.0001).

Conclusions: Clinical variables at diagnosis and at first surveillance biopsy during followup in an active surveillance program can be used to inform men about the likelihood of an unfavorable prostate biopsy. This information could improve patient and physician acceptance of active surveillance in carefully selected men.

Citing Articles

The association between patient and disease characteristics, and the risk of disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Duijn M, de Reijke T, Barwari K, Hagens M, Rynja S, Immerzeel J World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):87.

PMID: 38372786 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04805-9.


Active Surveillance-Is It Feasible for Intermediate-risk Localised Prostate Cancer?.

Mukherjee S, Promponas I, Petrides N, Hossain D, Abbaraju J, Madaan S Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021; 24:17-24.

PMID: 34337491 PMC: 8317861. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.12.005.


Biomarkers in active surveillance.

Loeb S, Tosoian J Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7(1):155-159.

PMID: 29594029 PMC: 5861276. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.26.


Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.

Kearns J, Faino A, Newcomb L, Brooks J, Carroll P, Dash A Eur Urol. 2018; 73(5):706-712.

PMID: 29433973 PMC: 6064187. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.016.


Diffusion weighted imaging of the prostate-principles, application, and advances.

Maurer M, Heverhagen J Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(3):490-498.

PMID: 28725591 PMC: 5503962. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.06.


References
1.
Cooperberg M, Broering J, Kantoff P, Carroll P . Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol. 2007; 178(3 Pt 2):S14-9. PMC: 2987559. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.135. View

2.
Schroder F, Hugosson J, Roobol M, Tammela T, Ciatto S, Nelen V . Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(13):1320-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. View

3.
Telesca D, Etzioni R, Gulati R . Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis associated with PSA screening from prostate cancer incidence trends. Biometrics. 2007; 64(1):10-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00825.x. View

4.
Al Otaibi M, Ross P, Fahmy N, Jeyaganth S, Trottier H, Sircar K . Role of repeated biopsy of the prostate in predicting disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance. Cancer. 2008; 113(2):286-92. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23575. View

5.
Barocas D, Cowan J, Smith Jr J, Carroll P . What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database. J Urol. 2008; 180(4):1330-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.019. View