Risk Stratification of Men Choosing Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: We sought to predict biopsy progression in men on prostate cancer surveillance.
Materials And Methods: A total of 376 men with a median age of 65.5 years (range 45.8 to 79.5) with low risk prostate cancer on surveillance underwent at least 1 followup biopsy after diagnosis. Progression was defined at surveillance biopsy as Gleason pattern 4 or 5, greater than 2 biopsy cores with cancer or greater than 50% involvement of any core with cancer. Proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate the association between covariates and progression at surveillance biopsy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of disease progression.
Results: Of the 376 men 123 (32.7%) had progression a median of 5.6 years (range 0.3 to 8.5) after diagnosis. Percent free PSA and maximum percent core involvement at diagnosis were associated with progression, allowing stratification of the progression risk at initial surveillance biopsy. Cancer presence and PSA density at initial surveillance biopsy were associated with subsequent progression, allowing stratification of the cumulative incidence of progression 3 years after initial surveillance biopsy (cumulative incidence 11.1%, 95% CI 4.7 to 25.2 for negative biopsy and PSAD less than 0.08 ng/ml/cm(3) vs 53.6%, 95% CI 38.6 to 70.0 for positive biopsy and PSAD 0.08 ng/ml/cm(3) or greater, log rank test p <0.0001).
Conclusions: Clinical variables at diagnosis and at first surveillance biopsy during followup in an active surveillance program can be used to inform men about the likelihood of an unfavorable prostate biopsy. This information could improve patient and physician acceptance of active surveillance in carefully selected men.
Duijn M, de Reijke T, Barwari K, Hagens M, Rynja S, Immerzeel J World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):87.
PMID: 38372786 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04805-9.
Active Surveillance-Is It Feasible for Intermediate-risk Localised Prostate Cancer?.
Mukherjee S, Promponas I, Petrides N, Hossain D, Abbaraju J, Madaan S Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021; 24:17-24.
PMID: 34337491 PMC: 8317861. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.12.005.
Biomarkers in active surveillance.
Loeb S, Tosoian J Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7(1):155-159.
PMID: 29594029 PMC: 5861276. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.26.
Kearns J, Faino A, Newcomb L, Brooks J, Carroll P, Dash A Eur Urol. 2018; 73(5):706-712.
PMID: 29433973 PMC: 6064187. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.016.
Diffusion weighted imaging of the prostate-principles, application, and advances.
Maurer M, Heverhagen J Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(3):490-498.
PMID: 28725591 PMC: 5503962. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.06.