» Articles » PMID: 20232128

Sensory Information in Local Field Potentials and Spikes from Visual and Auditory Cortices: Time Scales and Frequency Bands

Overview
Specialties Biology
Neurology
Date 2010 Mar 17
PMID 20232128
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies analyzing sensory cortical processing or trying to decode brain activity often rely on a combination of different electrophysiological signals, such as local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity. Understanding the relation between these signals and sensory stimuli and between different components of these signals is hence of great interest. We here provide an analysis of LFPs and spiking activity recorded from visual and auditory cortex during stimulation with natural stimuli. In particular, we focus on the time scales on which different components of these signals are informative about the stimulus, and on the dependencies between different components of these signals. Addressing the first question, we find that stimulus information in low frequency bands (<12 Hz) is high, regardless of whether their energy is computed at the scale of milliseconds or seconds. Stimulus information in higher bands (>50 Hz), in contrast, is scale dependent, and is larger when the energy is averaged over several hundreds of milliseconds. Indeed, combined analysis of signal reliability and information revealed that the energy of slow LFP fluctuations is well related to the stimulus even when considering individual or few cycles, while the energy of fast LFP oscillations carries information only when averaged over many cycles. Addressing the second question, we find that stimulus information in different LFP bands, and in different LFP bands and spiking activity, is largely independent regardless of time scale or sensory system. Taken together, these findings suggest that different LFP bands represent dynamic natural stimuli on distinct time scales and together provide a potentially rich source of information for sensory processing or decoding brain activity.

Citing Articles

Prefrontal cortex synchronization with the hippocampus and parietal cortex is strategy-dependent during spatial learning.

Garcia F, Torres M, Chacana-Veliz L, Espinosa N, El-Deredy W, Fuentealba P Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):79.

PMID: 39825081 PMC: 11742664. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07486-1.


Improved circuitry and post-processing for interleaved fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and electrophysiology measurements.

Avula A, Goyal A, Rusheen A, Yuen J, Dennis W, Eaker D Front Signal Process (Lausanne). 2024; 3.

PMID: 39554594 PMC: 11567673. DOI: 10.3389/frsip.2023.1195800.


Event detection and classification from multimodal time series with application to neural data.

Sadras N, Pesaran B, Shanechi M J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(2).

PMID: 38513289 PMC: 11817962. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad3678.


Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity.

Ahmadipour P, Sani O, Pesaran B, Shanechi M J Neural Eng. 2023; 21(2).

PMID: 38016450 PMC: 10913727. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad1053.


Compromised word-level neural tracking in the high-gamma band for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Luo C, Gao Y, Fan J, Liu Y, Yu Y, Zhang X Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1174720.

PMID: 37213926 PMC: 10196181. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1174720.


References
1.
Logothetis N . What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008; 453(7197):869-78. DOI: 10.1038/nature06976. View

2.
JUERGENS E, Guettler A, Eckhorn R . Visual stimulation elicits locked and induced gamma oscillations in monkey intracortical- and EEG-potentials, but not in human EEG. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 129(2):247-59. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050895. View

3.
Brunel N, Wang X . What determines the frequency of fast network oscillations with irregular neural discharges? I. Synaptic dynamics and excitation-inhibition balance. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 90(1):415-30. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01095.2002. View

4.
Averbeck B, Latham P, Pouget A . Neural correlations, population coding and computation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7(5):358-66. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1888. View

5.
Kayser C, Petkov C, Logothetis N . Tuning to sound frequency in auditory field potentials. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 98(3):1806-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00358.2007. View