» Articles » PMID: 18509031

Low-frequency Local Field Potentials and Spikes in Primary Visual Cortex Convey Independent Visual Information

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2008 May 30
PMID 18509031
Citations 192
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Local field potentials (LFPs) reflect subthreshold integrative processes that complement spike train measures. However, little is yet known about the differences between how LFPs and spikes encode rich naturalistic sensory stimuli. We addressed this question by recording LFPs and spikes from the primary visual cortex of anesthetized macaques while presenting a color movie. We then determined how the power of LFPs and spikes at different frequencies represents the visual features in the movie. We found that the most informative LFP frequency ranges were 1-8 and 60-100 Hz. LFPs in the range of 12-40 Hz carried little information about the stimulus, and may primarily reflect neuromodulatory inputs. Spike power was informative only at frequencies <12 Hz. We further quantified "signal correlations" (correlations in the trial-averaged power response to different stimuli) and "noise correlations" (trial-by-trial correlations in the fluctuations around the average) of LFPs and spikes recorded from the same electrode. We found positive signal correlation between high-gamma LFPs (60-100 Hz) and spikes, as well as strong positive signal correlation within high-gamma LFPs, suggesting that high-gamma LFPs and spikes are generated within the same network. LFPs <24 Hz shared strong positive noise correlations, indicating that they are influenced by a common source, such as a diffuse neuromodulatory input. LFPs <40 Hz showed very little signal and noise correlations with LFPs >40 Hz and with spikes, suggesting that low-frequency LFPs reflect neural processes that in natural conditions are fully decoupled from those giving rise to spikes and to high-gamma LFPs.

Citing Articles

Cross-Frequency Couplings Reveal Mice Visual Cortex Selectivity to Grating Orientations.

Ebrahimvand Z, Daliri M Brain Behav. 2025; 15(3):e70360.

PMID: 40079646 PMC: 11905059. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70360.


Uncovering population contributions to the extracellular potential in the mouse visual system using Laminar Population Analysis.

Rimehaug A, Dale A, Arkhipov A, Einevoll G PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(12):e1011830.

PMID: 39666739 PMC: 11670981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011830.


Exploring Kainic Acid-Induced Alterations in Circular Tripartite Networks with Advanced Analysis Tools.

Vinogradov A, Kapucu E, Narkilahti S eNeuro. 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39079743 PMC: 11289587. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0035-24.2024.


Sampling bias corrections for accurate neural measures of redundant, unique, and synergistic information.

Kocillari L, Lorenz G, Engel N, Celotto M, Curreli S, Blanco Malerba S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38895197 PMC: 11185652. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.04.597303.


Uncovering population contributions to the extracellular potential in the mouse visual system using Laminar Population Analysis.

Rimehaug A, Dale A, Arkhipov A, Einevoll G bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38293236 PMC: 10827114. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.15.575805.


References
1.
Averbeck B, Latham P, Pouget A . Neural correlations, population coding and computation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7(5):358-66. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1888. View

2.
Donoghue J, Sanes J, Hatsopoulos N, Gaal G . Neural discharge and local field potential oscillations in primate motor cortex during voluntary movements. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(1):159-73. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.1.159. View

3.
Steriade M, Hobson J . Neuronal activity during the sleep-waking cycle. Prog Neurobiol. 1976; 6(3-4):155-376. View

4.
Nir Y, Fisch L, Mukamel R, Gelbard-Sagiv H, Arieli A, Fried I . Coupling between neuronal firing rate, gamma LFP, and BOLD fMRI is related to interneuronal correlations. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(15):1275-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.066. View

5.
Rubino D, Robbins K, Hatsopoulos N . Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(12):1549-57. DOI: 10.1038/nn1802. View