Ethambutol Optimal Clinical Dose and Susceptibility Breakpoint Identification by Use of a Novel Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Model of Disseminated Intracellular Mycobacterium Avium
Overview
Affiliations
Ethambutol, together with a macrolide, is the backbone for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium disease. However, at the standard dose of 15 mg/kg of body weight/day, ethambutol efficacy is limited. In addition, susceptibility breakpoints have consistently failed to predict clinical outcome. We performed dose-effect studies with extracellular M. avium as well as with bacilli within human macrophages. The maximal kill rate (E(max)) for ethambutol against extracellular bacilli was 5.54 log(10) CFU/ml, compared to 0.67 log(10) CFU/ml for intracellular M. avium, after 7 days of exposure. Thus, extracellular assays demonstrated high efficacy. We created a hollow-fiber system model of intracellular M. avium and performed microbial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies using pharmacokinetics similar to those of ethambutol for humans. The E(max) in the systems was 0.79 log(10) CFU/ml with 7 days of daily therapy, so the kill rates approximated those encountered in patients treated with ethambutol monotherapy. Ratio of peak concentration to MIC (C(max)/MIC) was linked to microbial kill rate. The C(max)/MIC ratio needed to achieve the 90% effective concentration (EC(90)) in serum was 1.23, with a calculated intramacrophage C(max)/MIC ratio of 13. In 10,000 patient Monte Carlo simulations, doses of 15, 50, and 75 mg/kg achieved the EC(90) in 35.50%, 76.81%, and 86.12% of patients, respectively. Therefore, ethambutol doses of >or=50 mg/kg twice a week would be predicted to be better than current doses of 15 mg/kg for treatment of disseminated M. avium disease. New susceptibility breakpoints and critical concentrations of 1 to 2 mg/liter were identified for the determination of ethambutol-resistant M. avium in Middlebrook broth. Given that the modal MIC of clinical isolates is around 2 mg/liter, most isolates should be considered ethambutol resistant.
Nqwata L, Pasipanodya J, Black M, Feldman C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(23).
PMID: 39682590 PMC: 11640248. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14232682.
Antibacterial action of penicillin against .
Deshpande D, Magombedze G, Srivastava S, Gumbo T IJTLD Open. 2024; 1(8):362-368.
PMID: 39131587 PMC: 11308404. DOI: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0238.
Deshpande D, Magombedze G, Boorgula G, Chapagain M, Srivastava S, Gumbo T J Infect Dis. 2023; 230(2):e230-e240.
PMID: 38036299 PMC: 11326821. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiad545.
Singh S, Boorgula G, Aryal S, Philley J, Gumbo T, Srivastava S J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023; 79(1):96-99.
PMID: 37946564 PMC: 11032240. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad352.
Zheng X, Wang L, Forsman L, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Luo X BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e075383.
PMID: 37788924 PMC: 10551947. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075383.