» Articles » PMID: 20226451

Giant Laterally Spreading Tumors of the Papilla: Endoscopic Features, Resection Technique, and Outcome (with Videos)

Overview
Date 2010 Mar 16
PMID 20226451
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Successful endoscopic treatment of conventional papillary adenomas is well described. However, many authors recommend surgical resection for larger lesions with extrapapillary extension.

Objective: To describe the classification, technique, and outcome for the endoscopic resection of giant laterally spreading tumors of the papilla (LST-P).

Design: Single-center case series.

Settings: Tertiary referral academic gastroenterology unit.

Patients: Patients referred for endoscopic treatment of LST-P.

Intervention: Pre-resection staging and single-session endoscopic removal of papillary adenomas. For those classified as LST-P (>30 mm, extending beyond the papilla onto the duodenal wall and involving as much as two thirds of the duodenal circumference), a standardized single-session EMR technique was used.

Main Outcome Measurements: Technical success, complications, and adenoma recurrence for single-session removal of LST-P. Outcomes were compared with those of conventional ampullary adenoma resection during the same period.

Results: Twenty-five patients with ampullary adenomas were referred. In 10 patients identified with LST-P (mean age 70.2 years; adenoma size 30-80 mm), combination EMR and papillectomy was performed in a single session. The median admission duration was 1 night (range 0-35). Complications included bleeding (30%) and cholecystitis (10%), with no cases of pancreatitis or perforation. Adenoma recurrence at 3 months was found in 1 patient (10%). Complication and recurrence rates in smaller (<30 mm) ampullary adenoma resections were not significantly different.

Limitations: A relatively uncommon entity and thus small sample size.

Conclusions: Endoscopic resection of carefully staged LST-P is a viable therapeutic alternative to surgery. In experienced hands, the outcomes are comparable to those for conventional ampullary adenomas.

Citing Articles

Long-term recurrence after endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy of sporadic ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Garg R, Thind K, Bhalla J, Simonson M, Simons-Linares C, Singh A Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(7):5022-5044.

PMID: 37221416 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10083-0.


Indicative value of pathological classification of duodenal papillary adenomas in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Lv Y, Wang P, Chen J, Zhao L, Chen L, Zhuang Y Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(7):5183-5197.

PMID: 35286472 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08894-0.


Endoscopic pancreaticobiliary drainage with overlength stents to prevent delayed perforation after endoscopic papillectomy: A pilot study.

Wu L, Liu F, Zhang N, Wang X, Li W World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26(44):7036-7045.

PMID: 33311948 PMC: 7701946. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i44.7036.


Anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review of current evidence.

Chan A, Philpott H, Lim A, Au M, Tee D, Harding D World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 12(11):408-450.

PMID: 33269053 PMC: 7677885. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i11.408.


Endoscopic papillectomy; a retrospective international multicenter cohort study with long-term follow-up.

Fritzsche J, Klein A, Beekman M, van Hooft J, Sidhu M, Schoeman S Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(11):6259-6267.

PMID: 33159297 PMC: 8523407. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08126-x.