Observer Detection Limits for a Dedicated SPECT Breast Imaging System
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
An observer-based contrast-detail study is performed in an effort to evaluate the limits of object detectability using a dedicated CZT-based breast SPECT imaging system under various imaging conditions. A custom geometric contrast-resolution phantom was developed that can be used for both positive ('hot') and negative contrasts ('cold'). The 3 cm long fillable tubes are arranged in six sectors having equal inner diameters ranging from 1 mm to 6 mm with plastic wall thicknesses of <0.25 mm, on a pitch of twice their inner diameters. Scans of the activity filled tubes using simple circular trajectories are obtained in a 215 mL uniform water filled cylinder, varying the rod:background concentration ratios from 10:1 to 1:10 simulating a large range of biological uptake ratios. The rod phantom is then placed inside a non-uniformly shaped 500 mL breast phantom and scans are again acquired using both simple and complex 3D trajectories for similarly varying contrasts. Summed slice and contiguous multi-slice images are evaluated by five independent readers, identifying the smallest distinguishable rod for each concentration and experimental setup. Linear and quadratic regression is used to compare the resulting contrast-detail curves. Results indicate that in a moderately low-noise 500 mL background, using the SPECT camera having 2.5 mm intrinsic pixels, the mean detectable rod was approximately 3.4 mm at a 10:1 ratio, degrading to approximately 5.2 mm with the 2.5:1 concentration ratio. The smallest object detail was observed using a 45 degrees tilted trajectory acquisition. The complex 3D projected sine wave acquisition, however, had the most consistent combined intra- and inter-observer results, making it potentially the best imaging approach for consistent results.
Niimi T, Nanasato M, Sugimoto M, Maeda H Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017; 51(4):331-337.
PMID: 29242727 PMC: 5721085. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-017-0474-9.
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, OConnell A, Conover D Phys Med Biol. 2013; 58(22):7921-36.
PMID: 24165162 PMC: 3872967. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/7921.
Radionuclide methods and instrumentation for breast cancer detection and diagnosis.
Surti S Semin Nucl Med. 2013; 43(4):271-80.
PMID: 23725989 PMC: 3755372. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.03.003.
Mann S, Perez K, McCracken E, Shah J, Wong T, Tornai M J Oncol. 2012; 2012:146943.
PMID: 22956950 PMC: 3431100. DOI: 10.1155/2012/146943.
Perez K, Cutler S, Madhav P, Tornai M Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(16):4721-34.
PMID: 20671354 PMC: 3266057. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/007.