» Articles » PMID: 20212029

A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate an Ambulatory Primary Care Management Program for Patients with Dyslipidemia: the TEAM Study

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2010 Mar 10
PMID 20212029
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few studies have reported the efficacy of collaborative care involving family physicians and community pharmacists for patients with dyslipidemia.

Methods: We randomly assigned clusters consisting of at least two physicians and at least four pharmacists to provide collaborative care or usual care. Under the collaborative care model, pharmacists counselled patients about their medications, requested laboratory tests, monitored the effectiveness and safety of medications and patients' adherence to therapy, and adjusted medication dosages. After 12 months of follow-up, we assessed changes in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (the primary outcome), the proportion of patients reaching their target lipid levels and changes in other risk factors.

Results: Fifteen clusters representing a total of 77 physicians and 108 pharmacists were initially recruited, and a total of 51 physicians and 49 pharmacists were included in the final analyses. The collaborative care teams followed a total of 108 patients, and the usual care teams followed a total of 117 patients. At baseline, mean LDL cholesterol level was higher in the collaborative care group (3.5 v. 3.2 mmol/L, p = 0.05). During the study, patients in the collaborative care group were less likely to receive high-potency statins (11% v. 40%), had more visits with health care professionals and more laboratory tests, were more likely to have their lipid-lowering treatment changed and were more likely to report lifestyle changes. At 12 months, the crude incremental mean reduction in LDL cholesterol in the collaborative care group was -0.2 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to -0.1), and the adjusted reduction was -0.05 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.2). The crude relative risk of achieving lipid targets for patients in the collaborative care group was 1.10 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.26), and the adjusted relative risk was 1.16 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.34).

Interpretation: Collaborative care involving physicians and pharmacists had no significant clinical impact on lipid control in patients with dyslipidemia. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial register no. ISRCTN66345533.

Citing Articles

Implementation strategies to improve statin utilization in individuals with hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jones L, Tilberry S, Gregor C, Yaeger L, Hu Y, Sturm A Implement Sci. 2021; 16(1):40.

PMID: 33849601 PMC: 8045284. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01108-0.


"Clearly they are in the circle of care, but . . .": A qualitative study exploring perceptions of personal health information sharing with community pharmacists in an integrated care model.

Rolf von den Baumen T, Lake J, Everall A, Dainty K, Rosenberg-Yunger Z, Guilcher S Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020; 153(6):378-398.

PMID: 33282029 PMC: 7689615. DOI: 10.1177/1715163520956686.


Community pharmacy interventions for health promotion: effects on professional practice and health outcomes.

Steed L, Sohanpal R, Todd A, Madurasinghe V, Rivas C, Edwards E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12:CD011207.

PMID: 31808563 PMC: 6896091. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011207.pub2.


Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medication Reviews Conducted by Pharmacists on Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors in Ambulatory Care.

Martinez-Mardones F, Fernandez-Llimos F, Benrimoj S, Ahumada-Canale A, Plaza-Plaza J, Tonin F J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8(22):e013627.

PMID: 31711390 PMC: 6915276. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013627.


Barriers to a full scope of pharmacy practice in primary care: A systematic review of pharmacists' access to laboratory testing.

Donovan J, Tsuyuki R, Al Hamarneh Y, Bajorek B Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019; 152(5):317-333.

PMID: 31534587 PMC: 6739653. DOI: 10.1177/1715163519865759.


References
1.
McPherson R, Frohlich J, Fodor G, Genest J, Canadian Cardiovascular Society . Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement--recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2006; 22(11):913-27. PMC: 2570238. DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70310-5. View

2.
Rehring T, Stolcpart R, Sandhoff B, Merenich J, Hollis Jr H . Effect of a clinical pharmacy service on lipid control in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 43(6):1205-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.019. View

3.
Machado M, Nassor N, Bajcar J, Guzzo G, Einarson T . Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part III: systematic review and meta-analysis in hyperlipidemia management. Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42(9):1195-207. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1K618. View

4.
Farahani P, Levine M . Goal attainment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors in community-based clinical practice (a Canadian experience). J Eval Clin Pract. 2009; 15(1):212-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01002.x. View

5.
Villeneuve J, Lamarre D, Lussier M, Vanier M, Genest J, Blais L . Physician-pharmacist collaborative care for dyslipidemia patients: knowledge and skills of community pharmacists. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009; 29(4):201-8. DOI: 10.1002/chp.20038. View