» Articles » PMID: 20203658

Generation of Clonal Zebrafish Lines and Transplantable Hepatic Tumors

Overview
Journal Nat Protoc
Specialties Biology
Pathology
Science
Date 2010 Mar 6
PMID 20203658
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transplantable tumors are an accepted gold standard in cancer studies in rodents. The progress of this model in zebrafish has long been constrained by the lack of true inbred lines in zebrafish. We have generated several lines of homozygous diploid clonal zebrafish lines, which allow serial transplantations of tumor cells from one fish to another without sublethal gamma-irradiation. The spectrum of transplantable tumors that were initially induced and maintained in inbred clonal zebrafish lines was limited to different types of spontaneous and diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatic tumors. However, this model can readily be extended to a broad range of extrahepatic tumors, transgenic tumors with defined mechanisms of induction and fluorescence-tagged tumor lines. These models will further facilitate in-depth analysis of invasive tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis and tumor-initiating cells by in vivo imaging and provide a cost-effective system for high-throughput (HTP) screening of anticancer therapeutics, including biological response modifiers. In addition, homozygous zebrafish lines are an indispensable tool for immunogenetics, mapping of quantitative trait loci and other genetic applications. The whole procedure, from generation of a gynogenetic female homozygous fish (a founder) to obtaining 3-4 consecutive passages of a syngeneic tumor, takes approximately 12-18 months. This time-frame largely depends on methods of tumor induction, tumor type and tumor growth rate.

Citing Articles

Zebrafish as a Useful Model System for Human Liver Disease.

Shimizu N, Shiraishi H, Hanada T Cells. 2023; 12(18).

PMID: 37759472 PMC: 10526867. DOI: 10.3390/cells12182246.


Immune gene variation associated with chromosome-scale differences among individual zebrafish genomes.

McConnell S, Hernandez K, Andrade J, de Jong J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):7777.

PMID: 37179373 PMC: 10183018. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34467-3.


Combined Inhibition of Hedgehog and HDAC6: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies Reveal a New Role for Lysosomal Stress in Reducing Glioblastoma Cell Viability.

Pezzotta A, Brioschi L, Carbone S, Mazzoleni B, Bontempi V, Monastra F Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(6).

PMID: 36982845 PMC: 10051748. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065771.


Inducible Liver Cancer Models in Transgenic Zebrafish to Investigate Cancer Biology.

Lee A, Li Y, Gong Z Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(20).

PMID: 34680297 PMC: 8533791. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205148.


A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility.

Crim M, Lawrence C Lab Anim (NY). 2020; 50(1):19-25.

PMID: 33268901 DOI: 10.1038/s41684-020-00683-x.


References
1.
White R, Sessa A, Burke C, Bowman T, LeBlanc J, Ceol C . Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2008; 2(2):183-9. PMC: 2292119. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002. View

2.
Swenberg J, Dyroff M, Bedell M, Popp J, Huh N, Kirstein U . O4-ethyldeoxythymidine, but not O6-ethyldeoxyguanosine, accumulates in hepatocyte DNA of rats exposed continuously to diethylnitrosamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984; 81(6):1692-5. PMC: 344984. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.6.1692. View

3.
Streisinger G, Singer F, Walker C, Knauber D, Dower N . Segregation analyses and gene-centromere distances in zebrafish. Genetics. 1986; 112(2):311-9. PMC: 1202703. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/112.2.311. View

4.
Trede N, Langenau D, Traver D, Look A, Zon L . The use of zebrafish to understand immunity. Immunity. 2004; 20(4):367-79. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00084-6. View

5.
Nechiporuk A, Finney J, Keating M, Johnson S . Assessment of polymorphism in zebrafish mapping strains. Genome Res. 1999; 9(12):1231-8. PMC: 311009. DOI: 10.1101/gr.9.12.1231. View