» Articles » PMID: 20194423

Gene Family Size Conservation is a Good Indicator of Evolutionary Rates

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Mar 3
PMID 20194423
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evolution of duplicate genes has been a topic of broad interest. Here, we propose that the conservation of gene family size is a good indicator of the rate of sequence evolution and some other biological properties. By comparing the human-chimpanzee-macaque orthologous gene families with and without family size conservation, we demonstrate that genes with family size conservation evolve more slowly than those without family size conservation. Our results further demonstrate that both family expansion and contraction events may accelerate gene evolution, resulting in elevated evolutionary rates in the genes without family size conservation. In addition, we show that the duplicate genes with family size conservation evolve significantly more slowly than those without family size conservation. Interestingly, the median evolutionary rate of singletons falls in between those of the above two types of duplicate gene families. Our results thus suggest that the controversy on whether duplicate genes evolve more slowly than singletons can be resolved when family size conservation is taken into consideration. Furthermore, we also observe that duplicate genes with family size conservation have the highest level of gene expression/expression breadth, the highest proportion of essential genes, and the lowest gene compactness, followed by singletons and then by duplicate genes without family size conservation. Such a trend accords well with our observations of evolutionary rates. Our results thus point to the importance of family size conservation in the evolution of duplicate genes.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Family and Their Expression during Rhizobial and Mycorrhizal Symbiosis.

Cervera-Torres C, Arthikala M, Lara M, Blanco L, Nanjareddy K Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(11).

PMID: 36421782 PMC: 9691182. DOI: 10.3390/genes13112107.


Widespread false gene gains caused by duplication errors in genome assemblies.

Ko B, Lee C, Kim J, Rhie A, Yoo D, Howe K Genome Biol. 2022; 23(1):205.

PMID: 36167596 PMC: 9516828. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-022-02764-1.


Parallel Evolution of C-Type Lectin Domain Gene Family Sizes in Insect-Vectored Nematodes.

Ning J, Zhou J, Wang H, Liu Y, Ahmad F, Feng X Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:856826.

PMID: 35557736 PMC: 9085898. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.856826.


African Arowana Genome Provides Insights on Ancient Teleost Evolution.

Hao S, Han K, Meng L, Huang X, Cao W, Shi C iScience. 2020; 23(11):101662.

PMID: 33134892 PMC: 7586111. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101662.


Congruence Amidst Discordance between Sequence and Protein-Content Based Phylogenies of Fungi.

Xiao G, Tang G, Wang C J Fungi (Basel). 2020; 6(3).

PMID: 32823730 PMC: 7559059. DOI: 10.3390/jof6030134.


References
1.
Jimenez-Sanchez G, Childs B, Valle D . Human disease genes. Nature. 2001; 409(6822):853-5. DOI: 10.1038/35057050. View

2.
Zhang Z, Carriero N, Zheng D, Karro J, Harrison P, Gerstein M . PseudoPipe: an automated pseudogene identification pipeline. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(12):1437-9. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl116. View

3.
Johnson M, Viggiano L, Bailey J, Goodwin G, Rocchi M, Eichler E . Positive selection of a gene family during the emergence of humans and African apes. Nature. 2001; 413(6855):514-9. DOI: 10.1038/35097067. View

4.
Han M, Demuth J, McGrath C, Casola C, Hahn M . Adaptive evolution of young gene duplicates in mammals. Genome Res. 2009; 19(5):859-67. PMC: 2675974. DOI: 10.1101/gr.085951.108. View

5.
Li L, Huang Y, Xia X, Sun Z . Preferential duplication in the sparse part of yeast protein interaction network. Mol Biol Evol. 2006; 23(12):2467-73. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl121. View