» Articles » PMID: 20187834

Evaluation of the Effect of Signalment and Body Conformation on Activity Monitoring in Companion Dogs

Overview
Journal Am J Vet Res
Date 2010 Mar 2
PMID 20187834
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of signalment and body conformation on activity monitoring in companion dogs.

Animals: 104 companion dogs.

Procedures: While wearing an activity monitor, each dog was led through a series of standard activities: lying down, walking laps, trotting laps, and trotting up and down stairs. Linear regression analysis was used to determine which signalment and body conformation factors were associated with activity counts.

Results: There was no significant effect of signalment or body conformation on activity counts when dogs were lying down, walking laps, and trotting laps. However, when dogs were trotting up and down stairs, there was a significant effect of age and body weight such that, for every 1-kg increase in body weight, there was a 1.7% (95% confidence interval, 1.1% to 2.4%) decrease in activity counts and for every 1-year increase in age, there was a 4.2% (95% confidence interval, 1.4% to 6.9%) decrease in activity counts.

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: When activity was well controlled, there was no significant effect of signalment or body conformation on activity counts recorded by the activity monitor. However, when activity was less controlled, older dogs and larger dogs had lower activity counts than younger and smaller dogs. The wide range in body conformation (eg, limb or body length) among dogs did not appear to significantly impact the activity counts recorded by the monitor, but age and body weight did and must be considered in analysis of data collected from the monitors.

Citing Articles

Comparison of habitual physical activity in French Bulldogs, Pugs and normocephalic dogs by accelerometry.

Aromaa M, Putro H, Lilja-Maula L, Rajamaki M Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e60.

PMID: 38487414 PMC: 10936329. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.80.


Sensor-supported measurement of adaptability of dogs (Canis familiaris) to a shelter environment: Nocturnal activity and behavior.

van der Laan J, Vinke C, Arndt S PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0286429.

PMID: 37319231 PMC: 10270336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286429.


Activity patterns are associated with fractional lifespan, memory, and gait speed in aged dogs.

Mondino A, Khan M, Case B, Giovagnoli S, Thomson A, Lascelles B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2588.

PMID: 36788306 PMC: 9929073. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29181-z.


Enhanced Classification of Dog Activities with Quaternion-Based Fusion Approach on High-Dimensional Raw Data from Wearable Sensors.

Muminov A, Mukhiddinov M, Cho J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36502172 PMC: 9739384. DOI: 10.3390/s22239471.


Initial exploration of the discriminatory ability of the PetPace collar to detect differences in activity and physiological variables between healthy and osteoarthritic dogs.

Rowlison de Ortiz A, Belda B, Hash J, Enomoto M, Robertson J, Lascelles B Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022; 3:949877.

PMID: 36147035 PMC: 9485802. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.949877.


References
1.
Wiseman-Orr M, Scott E, Reid J, Nolan A . Validation of a structured questionnaire as an instrument to measure chronic pain in dogs on the basis of effects on health-related quality of life. Am J Vet Res. 2006; 67(11):1826-36. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.67.11.1826. View

2.
Ekelund U, Yngve A, Brage S, Westerterp K, Sjostrom M . Body movement and physical activity energy expenditure in children and adolescents: how to adjust for differences in body size and age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79(5):851-6. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.851. View

3.
Klesges R, Klesges L, Swenson A, Pheley A . A validation of two motion sensors in the prediction of child and adult physical activity levels. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 122(3):400-10. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114121. View

4.
Lohman T, Ring K, Schmitz K, Treuth M, Loftin M, Yang S . Associations of body size and composition with physical activity in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(6):1175-81. PMC: 2441868. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000222846.27380.61. View

5.
Dow C, Michel K, Love M, Brown D . Evaluation of optimal sampling interval for activity monitoring in companion dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2009; 70(4):444-8. PMC: 2907355. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.70.4.444. View