» Articles » PMID: 36147035

Initial Exploration of the Discriminatory Ability of the PetPace Collar to Detect Differences in Activity and Physiological Variables Between Healthy and Osteoarthritic Dogs

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 23
PMID 36147035
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accelerometry has been used to evaluate activity in dogs with osteoarthritis (OA) pain, especially in relation to effect of treatment; however no studies have compared accelerometry-measured activity in dogs with OA-pain and healthy dogs. The aims of this study were to (1) compare activity output from the PetPace collar with the validated Actical monitor and (2) determine if PetPace collar outputs (overall activity, activity levels, body position, and vital signs) differed between healthy dogs and dogs with OA-pain.

Methods: This was an observational, non-interventional study in healthy dogs and dogs with OA-pain. All dogs were outfitted with the PetPace collar and the Actical monitor simultaneously for 14 days. Output from these devices was compared (correlations), and output from the PetPace device was used to explore differences between groups across the activity and vital sign outputs (including calculated heart rate variability indices).

Results: There was moderate correlation between the PetPace collar and Actical monitor output ( = 0.56, < 0.001). Using data generated by the PetPace collar, OA-pain dogs had lower overall activity counts and spent less time standing than healthy dogs. Healthy dogs spent more time at higher activity levels than OA-pain dogs. Certain heart rate variability indices in OA-pain dogs were lower than in healthy dogs.

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that the PetPace collar can detect differences between healthy dogs and those with OA-pain, and that OA-pain negatively impacts overall activity levels in dogs, and especially higher intensity activity.

Citing Articles

Response to treatment with grapiprant as part of a standard multimodal regimen in young dogs with appendicular joint osteoarthritis associated pain.

Enomoto M, Hash J, Cole T, Porcel Sanchez M, Thomson A, Perry E Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1461628.

PMID: 39512920 PMC: 11541952. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1461628.


Prevalence of radiographic appendicular osteoarthritis and associated clinical signs in young dogs.

Enomoto M, de Castro N, Hash J, Thomson A, Nakanishi-Hester A, Perry E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2827.

PMID: 38310147 PMC: 10838335. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52324-9.


Therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of liposomal-cannabidiol injection: a pilot clinical study in dogs with naturally-occurring osteoarthritis.

Shilo-Benjamini Y, Lavy E, Yair N, Milgram J, Zilbersheid D, Hod A Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1224452.

PMID: 37680386 PMC: 10481162. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1224452.


The impact of stress and anesthesia on animal models of infectious disease.

Layton R, Layton D, Beggs D, Fisher A, Mansell P, Stanger K Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1086003.

PMID: 36816193 PMC: 9933909. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1086003.

References
1.
Wernham B, Trumpatori B, Hash J, Lipsett J, Davidson G, Wackerow P . Dose reduction of meloxicam in dogs with osteoarthritis-associated pain and impaired mobility. J Vet Intern Med. 2011; 25(6):1298-305. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.00825.x. View

2.
Schulz K, Altman D, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 340:c332. PMC: 2844940. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c332. View

3.
Johnston S . Osteoarthritis. Joint anatomy, physiology, and pathobiology. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1997; 27(4):699-723. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-5616(97)50076-3. View

4.
Evrengul H, Dursunoglu D, Cobankara V, Polat B, Seleci D, Kabukcu S . Heart rate variability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2003; 24(4):198-202. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-003-0357-5. View

5.
Conzemius M, Torres B, Muir P, Evans R, Krotscheck U, Budsberg S . Best practices for measuring and reporting ground reaction forces in dogs. Vet Surg. 2022; 51(3):385-396. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13772. View