» Articles » PMID: 20187107

Sirolimus-based Immunosuppression is Associated with Increased Survival After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Hepatology
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2010 Feb 27
PMID 20187107
Citations 111
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Liver transplantation is an important treatment option for selected patients with nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several reports have suggested a lower risk of posttransplant tumor recurrence with the use of sirolimus and a higher one with calcineurin inhibitors, but the selection of an ideal immunosuppression protocol is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to define the immunosuppression associated with the best survival after liver transplantation for HCC. It was based on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and included 2,491 adult recipients of isolated liver transplantation for HCC and 12,167 for non-HCC diagnoses between March 2002 and March 2009. All patients remained on stable maintenance immunosuppression protocols for at least 6 months posttransplant. In a multivariate analysis, only anti-CD25 antibody induction and sirolimus-based maintenance therapy were associated with improved survivals after transplantation for HCC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.9, P < or = 0.01; HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, P < or = 0.05, respectively). The other studied drugs, including calcineurin inhibitors, did not demonstrate a significant impact. In an effort to understand whether the observed effects were due to a direct impact of the drug on tumor or more on liver transplant in general, we conducted a similar analysis on non-HCC patients. Although anti-CD25 induction was again associated with a trend toward improved survival, sirolimus showed a trend toward lower rates of survival in non-HCC recipients, confirming the specificity of its beneficial impact to cancer patients.

Conclusion: According to these data, sirolimus-based immunosuppression has unique posttransplant effects on HCC patients that lead to improved survival.

Citing Articles

Transplant oncology and anti-cancer immunosuppressants.

Kong D, Duan J, Chen S, Wang Z, Ren J, Lu J Front Immunol. 2025; 15():1520083.

PMID: 39840041 PMC: 11747528. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1520083.


Impact of immunosuppressants on tumor pulmonary metastasis: new insight into transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chen J, Li H, Zhuo J, Lin Z, Hu Z, He C Cancer Biol Med. 2024; 21(11.

PMID: 39718153 PMC: 11667780. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0267.


Advancing immunosuppression in liver transplantation: the role of regulatory T cells in immune modulation and graft tolerance.

Han J, Park S Clin Transplant Res. 2024; 38(4):257-272.

PMID: 39696994 PMC: 11732766. DOI: 10.4285/ctr.24.0059.


Machine Perfusion as a Strategy to Decrease Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Lower Cancer Recurrence Following Liver Transplantation.

Garcia K, Hussein A, Satish S, Wehrle C, Karakaya O, Panconesi R Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682147 PMC: 11639801. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16233959.


Liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis: the exception, not the rule.

Tsilimigras D, Schizas D, Bakopoulos A, Pawlik T Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024; 13(5):857-860.

PMID: 39507732 PMC: 11534785. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-24-367.