» Articles » PMID: 20181050

Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) Training Package in Primary Care: Learning from Formative Evaluation

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2010 Feb 26
PMID 20181050
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The WISE (Whole System Informing Self-management Engagement) approach encompasses creating, finding, and implementing appropriate self-care support for people with long-term conditions. A training package for primary care to introduce the approach was developed and underwent formative evaluation. This entailed exploring the acceptability of the WISE approach and its effectiveness in changing communication within consultations. The study aimed to refine the patient, practitioner, and patient level components of the WISE approach and translate the principles of WISE into an operational intervention deliverable through National Health Service training methods.

Methods: Normalisation Process Theory provided a framework for development of the intervention. Practices were recruited from an inner city Primary Care Trust in NW England. All practice staff were expected to attend two afternoon training sessions. The training sessions were observed by members of the training team. Post-training audio recordings of consultations from each general practitioner and nurse in the practices were transcribed and read to provide a narrative overview of the incorporation of WISE skills and tools into consultations. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff post-training.

Results: Two practices out of 14 deemed eligible agreed to take part. Each practice attended two sessions, although a third session on consultation skills training was needed for one practice. Fifty-four post-training consultations were recorded from 15 clinicians. Two members of staff were interviewed at each practice. Significant elements of the training form and methods of delivery fitted contemporary practice. There were logistical problems in getting a whole practice to attend both sessions, and administrative staff founds some sections irrelevant. Clinicians reported problems incorporating some of the tools developed for WISE, and this was confirmed in the overview of consultations, with limited overt use of WISE tools and missed opportunities to address patients' self-management needs.

Conclusions: The formative evaluation approach and attention to normalisation process theory allowed the training team to make adjustments to content and delivery and ensure appropriate staff attended each session. The content of the course was simplified and focussed more clearly on operationalising the WISE approach. The patient arm of the approach was strengthened by raising expectations of a change in approach to self-care support by their practice.

Citing Articles

Using normalisation process theory (NPT) to explore implementation of the maternal perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) policy in Uganda: a reflection.

Walugembe D, Plamondon K, Kaharuza F, Waiswa P, Wylie L, Wathen N Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):148.

PMID: 39497093 PMC: 11536870. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01191-x.


Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Williams A, Lennox L, Harris M, Antonacci G Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1):55.

PMID: 37891671 PMC: 10612208. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01311-1.


Implementation of physical activity interventions for people with inflammatory arthritis: an overview and future recommendations.

Cornwall N, Swaithes L, Woodcock C, Healey E, Hider S Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2023; 7(1):rkac094.

PMID: 36699546 PMC: 9870707. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac094.


Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making Training Programs for Health Care Professionals Using Reflexivity Strategies: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review.

Thiab Diouf N, Musabyimana A, Blanchette V, Lepine J, Guay-Belanger S, Tremblay M JMIR Med Educ. 2022; 8(4):e42033.

PMID: 36318726 PMC: 9773026. DOI: 10.2196/42033.


Making change last? Exploring the value of sustainability approaches in healthcare: a scoping review.

Lennox L, Linwood-Amor A, Maher L, Reed J Health Res Policy Syst. 2020; 18(1):120.

PMID: 33050921 PMC: 7556957. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00601-0.


References
1.
Freeman A, Sweeney K . Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ. 2001; 323(7321):1100-2. PMC: 59686. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1100. View

2.
McDonald R, Campbell S, Lester H . Practice nurses and the effects of the new general practitioner contract in the English National Health Service: the extension of a professional project?. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(7):1206-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.039. View

3.
Checkland K, Harrison S, McDonald R, Grant S, Campbell S, Guthrie B . Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract. Sociol Health Illn. 2008; 30(5):788-803. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01081.x. View

4.
Sheaff R, Pilgrim D . Can learning organizations survive in the newer NHS?. Implement Sci. 2006; 1:27. PMC: 1635555. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-27. View

5.
Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M . Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(2):181-90. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr065990. View