» Articles » PMID: 19254819

Practice Nurses and the Effects of the New General Practitioner Contract in the English National Health Service: the Extension of a Professional Project?

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2009 Mar 4
PMID 19254819
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper reports the impact on nurses working in primary health care settings of changes to the general practitioner (GP) contract in England implemented in 2004. Previous changes to the GP contract in 1990, which gave financial rewards for health promotion activities, were seen as enabling nurses to take on work that GPs did not want and providing an impetus for the development of a professional project (Broadbent, J. (1998). Practice nurses and the effects of the new general practitioner contract in the British NHS: the advent of a professional project? Social Science & Medicine, 47(4), 497-506). Our study, which involved interviews with nurses from 20 practices, finds that nurses are taking on work which has previously been the exclusive preserve of medical professionals. An increasing emphasis in nurses' accounts on technical skills and knowledge may help decouple nursing from a narrative of caring, which has been seen as detracting from professional advancement. Our research suggests that practice nurse work is changing to reflect a more medical (and masculine) orientation to service delivery. At the same time, nursing work is described as routine and template driven, which may limit claims to 'professional' status. The reaction of some practice nurses to Health Care Assistants encroaching on what was previously practice nurse territory suggests a policing of boundaries, rather than an inclusive approach to colleagues within the nursing team. This resonates with Davies' (Davies, C. (1995). Gender and the professional predicament in nursing. Bucks: Open University Press) suggestion that professionalisation as a process involves compliance with a masculine notion of professionalism (autonomous, elite, individual, divisive, detached) which marginalises feminine attributes and devalues the work done by women. The study also raises questions about the role of caring in general practice settings where nurses choose to prioritise other concerns.

Citing Articles

Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANPs) experiences of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Scheme: a UK case study.

Khan N, Peckham S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e087492.

PMID: 39581711 PMC: 11590828. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087492.


Community-based integrated care for patients with diabetes and depression (CIC-PDD): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Wang Y, Guo D, Wang M, Hu M, Zhu D, Yu Q Trials. 2023; 24(1):550.

PMID: 37608381 PMC: 10464429. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07561-0.


Malpractice litigation, workload, and general practitioner retirement.

Birkeland S, Bogh S Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020; 20:e23.

PMID: 32799978 PMC: 6476390. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423618000816.


The effectiveness of a nurse-led illness perception intervention in COPD patients: a cluster randomised trial in primary care.

Weldam S, Schuurmans M, Zanen P, Heijmans M, Sachs A, Lammers J ERJ Open Res. 2017; 3(4).

PMID: 29250529 PMC: 5722077. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00115-2016.


Rural GPs' attitudes toward participating in emergency medicine: a qualitative study.

Hjortdahl M, Halvorsen P, Risor M Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016; 34(4):377-384.

PMID: 27827547 PMC: 5217286. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249047.