» Articles » PMID: 20178587

Evolution of Spliceosomal Introns Following Endosymbiotic Gene Transfer

Overview
Journal BMC Evol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 Feb 25
PMID 20178587
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Spliceosomal introns are an ancient, widespread hallmark of eukaryotic genomes. Despite much research, many questions regarding the origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns remain unsolved, partly due to the difficulty of inferring ancestral gene structures. We circumvent this problem by using genes originated by endosymbiotic gene transfer, in which an intron-less structure at the time of the transfer can be assumed.

Results: By comparing the exon-intron structures of 64 mitochondrial-derived genes that were transferred to the nucleus at different evolutionary periods, we can trace the history of intron gains in different eukaryotic lineages. Our results show that the intron density of genes transferred relatively recently to the nuclear genome is similar to that of genes originated by more ancient transfers, indicating that gene structure can be rapidly shaped by intron gain after the integration of the gene into the genome and that this process is mainly determined by forces acting specifically on each lineage. We analyze 12 cases of mitochondrial-derived genes that have been transferred to the nucleus independently in more than one lineage.

Conclusions: Remarkably, the proportion of shared intron positions that were gained independently in homologous genes is similar to that proportion observed in genes that were transferred prior to the speciation event and whose shared intron positions might be due to vertical inheritance. A particular case of parallel intron gain in the nad7 gene is discussed in more detail.

Citing Articles

Molecular analyses of the tubby-like protein gene family and their response to salt and high temperature in the foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

Jiang Z, Chen X, Ruan L, Xu Y, Li K Funct Integr Genomics. 2024; 24(5):170.

PMID: 39317784 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-024-01458-0.


Intron losses and gains in the nematodes.

Ma M, Xia J, Shu K, Niu D Biol Direct. 2022; 17(1):13.

PMID: 35659725 PMC: 9169325. DOI: 10.1186/s13062-022-00328-8.


The economics of organellar gene loss and endosymbiotic gene transfer.

Kelly S Genome Biol. 2021; 22(1):345.

PMID: 34930424 PMC: 8686548. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02567-w.


Evaluation of the mechanisms of intron loss and gain in the social amoebae Dictyostelium.

Ma M, Che X, Porceddu A, Niu D BMC Evol Biol. 2015; 15:286.

PMID: 26678305 PMC: 4683709. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0567-y.


Novel Introner-Like Elements in fungi Are Involved in Parallel Gains of Spliceosomal Introns.

Collemare J, Beenen H, Crous P, de Wit P, van der Burgt A PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0129302.

PMID: 26046656 PMC: 4457414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129302.


References
1.
Bruno W, Halpern A . Topological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models. Mol Biol Evol. 1999; 16(4):564-6. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026137. View

2.
Benson D, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman D, Ostell J, Wheeler D . GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(1):23-7. PMC: 165504. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg057. View

3.
Roy S, Penny D . Patterns of intron loss and gain in plants: intron loss-dominated evolution and genome-wide comparison of O. sativa and A. thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 2006; 24(1):171-81. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl159. View

4.
Basu M, Rogozin I, Deusch O, Dagan T, Martin W, Koonin E . Evolutionary dynamics of introns in plastid-derived genes in plants: saturation nearly reached but slow intron gain continues. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 25(1):111-9. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm234. View

5.
Sverdlov A, Rogozin I, Babenko V, Koonin E . Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(6):1741-8. PMC: 1069513. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki316. View