» Articles » PMID: 20163806

Children's (in)ability to Recover from Garden Paths in a Verb-final Language: Evidence for Developing Control in Sentence Processing

Overview
Specialties Pediatrics
Psychology
Date 2010 Feb 19
PMID 20163806
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An eye-tracking study explored Korean-speaking adults' and 4- and 5-year-olds' ability to recover from misinterpretations of temporarily ambiguous phrases during spoken language comprehension. Eye movement and action data indicated that children, but not adults, had difficulty in recovering from these misinterpretations despite strong disambiguating evidence at the end of the sentence. These findings are notable for their striking similarities with findings from children parsing English; however, in those and other studies of English, children were found to be reluctant to use late-arriving syntactic evidence to override earlier verb-based cues to structure, whereas here Korean children were reluctant to use late-arriving verb-based cues to override earlier syntactic evidence. The findings implicate a general cross-linguistic pattern for parsing development in which late-developing cognitive control abilities mediate the recovery from so-called "garden path" sentences. Children's limited cognitive control prevents them from inhibiting misinterpretations even when the disambiguating evidence comes from highly informative verb information.

Citing Articles

Children's Interpretations of Numerically Quantified Expression Ambiguities: Evidence from Quantified Noun Phrases and Bare Cardinals.

Mousoulidou M, Paterson K Children (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39062206 PMC: 11274410. DOI: 10.3390/children11070756.


Learning verbs in English and Korean: The roles of word order and argument drop.

Shi H, He A, Song H, Jin K, Arunachalam S Lang Learn Dev. 2024; 20(1):19-39.

PMID: 38645571 PMC: 11029125. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2023.2165926.


Are prosodic effects on sentence comprehension dependent on age?.

Fortunato-Tavares T, Schwartz R, de Andrade C, Houston D, Marton K Codas. 2023; 35(2):e20210062.

PMID: 36888745 PMC: 10010431. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021062.


The influence of cognitive control on the processing of L2 garden path sentence among Chinese-English bilinguals.

Xie Z, Zeng G, Zhou S, Wang J Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:976155.

PMID: 36212192 PMC: 9539755. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.976155.


Change is hard: Individual differences in children's lexical processing and executive functions after a shift in dimensions.

Pomper R, Kaushanskaya M, Saffran J Lang Learn Dev. 2022; 18(2):229-247.

PMID: 35600505 PMC: 9122267. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1947289.


References
1.
MacDonald M, Pearlmutter N, Seidenberg M . The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected]. Psychol Rev. 1994; 101(4):676-703. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676. View

2.
Sabbagh M, Moses L, Shiverick S . Executive functioning and preschoolers' understanding of false beliefs, false photographs, and false signs. Child Dev. 2006; 77(4):1034-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00917.x. View

3.
HUTTENLOCHER P, Dabholkar A . Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1997; 387(2):167-78. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-z. View

4.
Weighall A . The kindergarten path effect revisited: children's use of context in processing structural ambiguities. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007; 99(2):75-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.10.004. View

5.
Sekerina I, Stromswold K, Hestvik A . How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns?. J Child Lang. 2004; 31(1):123-52. View