Does Variability in Human Performance Outweigh Imprecision in Response Devices Such As Computer Keyboards?
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In chronometric research, it is well-known that many response devices used with personal computers, especially computer keyboards, suffer from measurement inaccuracies due to infrequent polling. In this article, it is investigated whether it is worth being concerned by this added error, given that human performance inherently exhibits a considerable degree of variability. By comparing inaccuracy due to response device imprecision with the level of variability already present in human performance, it is shown that the former is very unlikely to have a negative impact on statistical outcomes. In other words, millisecond resolution of response devices, although desirable, is not a general requirement.
Using facial expressions instead of response keys in the implicit association test.
Bar-Anan Y, Hershman R Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(1):468-484.
PMID: 36703002 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02060-1.
lab.js: A free, open, online study builder.
Henninger F, Shevchenko Y, Mertens U, Kieslich P, Hilbig B Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(2):556-573.
PMID: 34322854 PMC: 9046347. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5.
Cognitive test scores vary with choice of personal digital device.
Passell E, Strong R, Rutter L, Kim H, Scheuer L, Martini P Behav Res Methods. 2021; 53(6):2544-2557.
PMID: 33954913 PMC: 8568735. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01597-3.
Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices.
Anwyl-Irvine A, Dalmaijer E, Hodges N, Evershed J Behav Res Methods. 2020; 53(4):1407-1425.
PMID: 33140376 PMC: 8367876. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5.
Pronk T, Wiers R, Molenkamp B, Murre J Behav Res Methods. 2019; 52(3):1371-1382.
PMID: 31823223 PMC: 7280355. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01321-2.