» Articles » PMID: 20150074

Laboratory Methods for High-throughput Genotyping

Overview
Date 2010 Feb 13
PMID 20150074
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The genetics of complex diseases has been given a tremendous boost in recent years by the introduction of high-throughput laboratory methods that make it possible to approach larger questions in larger populations and to cover the genome more comprehensively. The ability to determine genotypes of many individuals accurately and efficiently has allowed genetic studies that cover more of the variation within individual genes, instead of focusing only on one or a few coding variants, and to do so in study samples of reasonable power. Chip-based genotyping assays, combined with knowledge of the patterns of coinheritance of markers (linkage disequilibrium [LD]), have stimulated genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of complex diseases. Recent successes of GWAS in identifying specific genes that affect risk for common diseases are dramatic illustrations of how improved technology can lead to scientific breakthroughs. A key issue in high-throughput genotyping is to choose the appropriate technology for your goals and for the stage of your experiment, being cognizant of your sample numbers and resources. This article introduces some of the commonly used methods of high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping for different stages of genetic studies and briefly reviews some of the high-throughput sequencing methods just coming into use. It also mentions some recent developments in "next-generation" sequencing that will enable other kinds of studies. This article is not intended to be comprehensive, and because technology in this area is rapidly changing, our comments should be taken as a starting point for further investigation.

Citing Articles

Modified "Allele-Specific qPCR" Method for SNP Genotyping Based on FRET.

Kalendar R, Baidyussen A, Serikbay D, Zotova L, Khassanova G, Kuzbakova M Front Plant Sci. 2022; 12:747886.

PMID: 35082803 PMC: 8784781. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.747886.


Deep learning model reveals potential risk genes for ADHD, especially Ephrin receptor gene EPHA5.

Liu L, Feng X, Li H, Cheng Li S, Qian Q, Wang Y Brief Bioinform. 2021; 22(6).

PMID: 34109382 PMC: 8575025. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab207.


The SNP-set based association study identifies ITGA1 as a susceptibility gene of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Han Chinese.

Liu L, Zhang L, Li H, Wang Z, Xie X, Mei J Transl Psychiatry. 2017; 7(8):e1201.

PMID: 28809852 PMC: 5611725. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2017.156.


NRSF and BDNF polymorphisms as biomarkers of cognitive dysfunction in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

Warburton A, Miyajima F, Shazadi K, Crossley J, Johnson M, Marson A Epilepsy Behav. 2015; 54:117-27.

PMID: 26708060 PMC: 4732989. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.11.013.


Jumping on the Train of Personalized Medicine: A Primer for Non-Geneticist Clinicians: Part 2. Fundamental Concepts in Genetic Epidemiology.

Li A, Meyre D Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2015; 10(2):101-117.

PMID: 25598767 PMC: 4287874. DOI: 10.2174/1573400510666140319235334.