» Articles » PMID: 20137785

Blastocyst Versus Cleavage Stage Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization: Differences in Neonatal Outcome?

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2010 Feb 9
PMID 20137785
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare neonatal outcome of blastocyst and cleavage stage embryo transfers after IVF.

Design: Register study.

Setting: Births recorded in the Swedish Medical Birth Register after IVF performed, 2002-2006.

Patient(s): Treatments reported from all Swedish IVF clinics.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Some neonatal characteristics were compared in 1,311 infants born after blastocyst-stage transfer and 12,562 infants born after cleavage-stage transfer. Comparisons were also made with all births, 2002-2007 (n = 598,687).

Result(s): After adjusting for year of birth, maternal age, parity, smoking habits, and body mass index, the risk of preterm birth among singletons was significantly greater after blastocyst-stage transfer than after cleavage-stage transfer. The risk of congenital malformations was also significantly higher. When the analysis was restricted to clinics where blastocyst transfers were made, the risk estimates increased for preterm birth, low birth weight, low APGAR score, and respiratory diagnoses, but did not change for congenital malformations.

Conclusion(s): The results indicate a small increase in risk associated with blastocyst transfer, perhaps owing to the longer period of in vitro culture. There is a possibility that this effect is due, at least in part, to a selection of women for blastocyst transfers. Further studies are needed either to verify or to refute the found associations.

Citing Articles

A comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst or cleavage stage embryo transfer in singletons and twins and between singleton siblings.

Raja E, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A, McLernon D Hum Reprod Open. 2023; 2023(2):hoad003.

PMID: 36909797 PMC: 9995092. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad003.


Investigation of the effects of trophectoderm morphology on obstetric outcomes in fifth day blastocyst transfer in patients undergoing in-vitro-fertilization.

Hamidova A, Isenlik B, Hidisoglu E, Dirican E, Olgan S, Kumru S J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022; 23(3):167-176.

PMID: 35781674 PMC: 9450918. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2021-10-8.


Congenital anomaly and perinatal outcome following blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Siristatidis C, Papapanou M, Karageorgiou V, Martins W, Bellos I, Teixeira D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 61(1):12-25.

PMID: 35751886 PMC: 10107888. DOI: 10.1002/uog.26019.


Perinatal outcome in children born after assisted reproductive technologies.

Wennerholm U, Bergh C Ups J Med Sci. 2020; 125(2):158-166.

PMID: 32124667 PMC: 7720966. DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1726534.


Evaluation of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction Technology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tanaka H, Tanaka K, Osato K, Kusaka H, Maegawa Y, Taniguchi H Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56(1).

PMID: 31952287 PMC: 7023248. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56010032.