» Articles » PMID: 26590822

Chromosomal Instability in Mammalian Pre-implantation Embryos: Potential Causes, Detection Methods, and Clinical Consequences

Overview
Journal Cell Tissue Res
Date 2015 Nov 23
PMID 26590822
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Formation of a totipotent blastocyst capable of implantation is one of the first major milestones in early mammalian embryogenesis, but less than half of in vitro fertilized embryos from most mammals will progress to this stage of development. Whole chromosomal abnormalities, or aneuploidy, are key determinants of whether human embryos will arrest or reach the blastocyst stage. Depending on the type of chromosomal abnormality, however, certain embryos still form blastocysts and may be morphologically indistinguishable from chromosomally normal embryos. Despite the implementation of pre-implantation genetic screening and other advanced in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques, the identification of aneuploid embryos remains complicated by high rates of mosaicism, atypical cell division, cellular fragmentation, sub-chromosomal instability, and micro-/multi-nucleation. Moreover, several of these processes occur in vivo following natural human conception, suggesting that they are not simply a consequence of culture conditions. Recent technological achievements in genetic, epigenetic, chromosomal, and non-invasive imaging have provided additional embryo assessment approaches, particularly at the single-cell level, and clinical trials investigating their efficacy are continuing to emerge. In this review, we summarize the potential mechanisms by which aneuploidy may arise, the various detection methods, and the technical advances (such as time-lapse imaging, "-omic" profiling, and next-generation sequencing) that have assisted in obtaining this data. We also discuss the possibility of aneuploidy resolution in embryos via various corrective mechanisms, including multi-polar divisions, fragment resorption, endoreduplication, and blastomere exclusion, and conclude by examining the potential implications of these findings for IVF success and human fecundity.

Citing Articles

A Patient Diagnosed with Mosaic Trisomy 18 Presenting New Symptoms: Diaphragmatic Relaxation and Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome. Updated Review of Mosaic Trisomy 18 Cases.

Kosa M, Horvath E, Kalmar T, Maroti Z, Foldesi I, Bereczki C J Pediatr Genet. 2024; 13(4):320-325.

PMID: 39502855 PMC: 11534437. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757621.


Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Next-Generation Sequencing in Sperm Evaluation: Implications for Preimplantation Genetic Testing and Male Infertility.

Moustakli E, Gkountis A, Dafopoulos S, Zikopoulos A, Sotiriou S, Zachariou A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39457078 PMC: 11508275. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011296.


The physiological and pathological mechanisms of early embryonic development.

Mu J, Zhou Z, Sang Q, Wang L Fundam Res. 2024; 2(6):859-872.

PMID: 38933386 PMC: 11197659. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.08.011.


Surviving the Storm: The Role of Poly- and Depolyploidization in Tissues and Tumors.

Zhao Y, He S, Zhao M, Huang Q Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(24):e2306318.

PMID: 38629780 PMC: 11199982. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306318.


Mechanism of chromosomal mosaicism in preimplantation embryos and its effect on embryo development.

Zhang X, Zheng P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(5):1127-1141.

PMID: 38386118 PMC: 11143108. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03048-2.


References
1.
Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C, Cohen J . Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 4(3):223-32. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61810-x. View

2.
Kloosterman W, Cuppen E . Chromothripsis in congenital disorders and cancer: similarities and differences. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013; 25(3):341-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.008. View

3.
Macklon N, Geraedts J, Fauser B . Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the 'black box' of early pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Update. 2002; 8(4):333-43. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/8.4.333. View

4.
Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Polz W, Tews G . Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 2001; 76(2):281-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01904-5. View

5.
Enders A, Hendrickx A, Binkerd P . Abnormal development of blastocysts and blastomeres in the rhesus monkey. Biol Reprod. 1982; 26(2):353-66. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod26.2.353. View