» Articles » PMID: 20136227

Compensations in Response to Real-time Formant Perturbations of Different Magnitudes

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2010 Feb 9
PMID 20136227
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous auditory perturbation studies have demonstrated that talkers spontaneously compensate for real-time formant-shifts by altering formant production in a manner opposite to the perturbation. Here, two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of amplitude of perturbation on the compensatory behavior for the vowel /epsilon/. In the first experiment, 20 male talkers received three step-changes in acoustic feedback: F1 was increased by 50, 100, and 200 Hz, while F2 was simultaneously decreased by 75, 125, and 250 Hz. In the second experiment, 21 male talkers received acoustic feedback in which the shifts in F1 and F2 were incremented by +4 and -5 Hz on each utterance to a maximum of +350 and -450 Hz, respectively. In both experiments, talkers altered production of F1 and F2 in a manner opposite to that of the formant-shift perturbation. Compensation was approximately 25%-30% of the perturbation magnitude for shifts in F1 and F2 up to 200 and 250 Hz, respectively. As larger shifts were applied, compensation reached a plateau and then decreased. The similarity of results across experiments suggests that the compensatory response is dependent on the perturbation magnitude but not on the rate at which the perturbation is introduced.

Citing Articles

Auditory imagery ability influences accuracy when singing with altered auditory feedback.

Reed C, Pearce M, McPherson A Music Sci. 2024; 28(3):478-501.

PMID: 39219861 PMC: 11357896. DOI: 10.1177/10298649231223077.


Speech sensorimotor relationships in francophone preschoolers and adults: Adaptation to real-time auditory feedback perturbations.

Trudeau-Fisette P, Vidou C, Menard L PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0306246.

PMID: 39172970 PMC: 11341022. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306246.


Increased vowel contrast and intelligibility in connected speech induced by sensorimotor adaptation.

Beach S, Johnson S, Parrell B, Parrell B, Niziolek C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39149284 PMC: 11326165. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.04.606537.


Discrimination and sensorimotor adaptation of self-produced vowels in cochlear implant users.

Borjigin A, Bakst S, Anderson K, Litovsky R, Niziolek C J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(3):1895-1908.

PMID: 38456732 PMC: 11527478. DOI: 10.1121/10.0025063.


Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.

Kim K, Gaines J, Parrell B, Ramanarayanan V, Nagarajan S, Houde J PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(7):e1011244.

PMID: 37506120 PMC: 10434967. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011244.


References
1.
Nasir S, Ostry D . Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11(10):1217-22. PMC: 2601702. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2193. View

2.
Burr D, Alais D . Combining visual and auditory information. Prog Brain Res. 2006; 155:243-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55014-9. View

3.
Oller D, Eilers R . The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Dev. 1988; 59(2):441-9. View

4.
Liu H, Larson C . Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 122(6):3671-7. DOI: 10.1121/1.2800254. View

5.
Larson C, Altman K, Liu H, Hain T . Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 187(4):613-21. PMC: 2763543. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1330-z. View