» Articles » PMID: 20132349

Measurement and Correlates of Ano-genital Distance in Healthy, Newborn Infants

Overview
Journal Int J Androl
Date 2010 Feb 6
PMID 20132349
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ano-genital distance (AGD) is a sexually dimorphic trait that is a well established reproductive toxicity endpoint in animals. In male animals, a shortened AGD is associated with a variety of genital abnormalities including hypospadias and cryptorchidism. Consensus on the anatomical definition of AGD in humans remains to be established and few data exist on the determinants and normal variance in the general population. We implemented a standardized anthropometric protocol to measure AGD, ano-scrotal distance (ASD), and ano-fourchette distance (AFD) in 169 (82 male, 87 female) infants in the University of Washington newborn nursery in 2008. We collected data on the following characteristics: weight, length, and occipital head circumference, race and relevant gestational complications. Using linear regression modelling, we examined AGD/ASD/AFD for sexual dimorphism, normal population variance and predictors of the measurement in infants. The mean male and female AGD measurements were 52.0 mm (SD +/- 5.5) and 37.2 mm (SD +/- 3.7). The mean ASD and AFD were 23.0 mm (SD +/- 3.8) and 15.1 mm (SD +/- 2.9). Weight, length, occipital head circumference and gestational age were associated with AGD (p < 0.05). Weight and length were the most important correlates to AGD. We confirmed previous findings that AGD is a sexually dimorphic measurement that is most strongly predicted by infant weight. The application of this measurement to clinically relevant outcomes remains to be explored in further depth.

Citing Articles

The Predictive Accuracy of Anogenital Distance and Genital Tubercle Angle for First-Trimester Fetal Sex Determination.

Alfuraih A, Almajem B, Alsolai A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202299 PMC: 11353859. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161811.


Generation of South Indian Data for Normal Clitoral Dimensions and Anogenital Ratio in Term Neonates.

Priyadarshini K, Padankatti S, Mahadevan S Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 28(2):208-212.

PMID: 38911105 PMC: 11189291. DOI: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_145_23.


Association of prenatal chlorpyrifos exposure with sexually dimorphic differences in anogenital distance among Thai farmworker children.

Dang T, Sehgal N, Barr D, Panuwet P, Liang D, Smarr M Environ Res. 2024; 248:118325.

PMID: 38286251 PMC: 11023773. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118325.


Estimation of Reference Values for External Genitalia Parameters in North Indian Preterm and Term Female Newborns.

Nanda P, Yadav J, Dayal D, Kumar R, Kumar P, Kumar J Indian J Pediatr. 2023; 91(6):548-555.

PMID: 37490223 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-023-04743-1.


Estimation of Reference Values for External Genitalia Parameters in North Indian Preterm and Term Male Newborns.

Nanda P, Yadav J, Dayal D, Kumar R, Kumar P, Kumar J Indian J Pediatr. 2023; 91(6):556-563.

PMID: 37389773 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-023-04703-9.


References
1.
Goldman A, Bongiovanni A . Induced genital anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967; 142(3):755-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1967.tb14686.x. View

2.
Marty M, Chapin R, Parks L, Thorsrud B . Development and maturation of the male reproductive system. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2003; 68(2):125-36. DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.10015. View

3.
Bowman C, Barlow N, Turner K, Wallace D, Foster P . Effects of in utero exposure to finasteride on androgen-dependent reproductive development in the male rat. Toxicol Sci. 2003; 74(2):393-406. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg128. View

4.
Gray L, Ostby J, Furr J, Wolf C, Lambright C, Parks L . Effects of environmental antiandrogens on reproductive development in experimental animals. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7(3):248-64. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/7.3.248. View

5.
Arbuckle T, Hauser R, Swan S, Mao C, Longnecker M, Main K . Meeting report: measuring endocrine-sensitive endpoints within the first years of life. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116(7):948-51. PMC: 2453165. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11226. View